Over the centuries, the art of rhetoric and dialectic involving active listening, questioning, and reasoned discourse was highly valued in Western intellectual and educational traditions. From the Socratic dialogues of ancient Greece to the Parliamentary debates of 18th century Britain, the skills and cultural practices surrounding substantive dialogue were seen as vital for the pursuit of truth, mutual understanding, and wisdom. However, in our contemporary age, critics across numerous fields have lamented that these profound capacities for listening and engaging in genuine exchange of ideas appear to have atrophied and degenerated, both within formal education and the public sphere.
The Primordial Origins of Language and Dialogue
The human facility for complex symbolic language, reasoned discourse, and cooperative society is arguably what most separates our species from other lifeforms. Some anthropologists theorize that the earliest development of syntactic language as a system of symbolic representation enabled the equivalent of an early "cognitive revolution" (Harari). The rise of linguistic abilities allowed our prehistoric ancestors to instruct, govern convention, reinforce social norms, and cooperate with increasing complexity compared to other primates.
As humans evolved linguistic capacity, the practices of dialogue, rhetorical persuasion, and interpersonal influence evolved alongside. According to the ancient sophists of Greece, logos or skilled use of reason in speech was one of the elemental forces of the cosmos alongside physis (natural order) and nomos (human convention/law). Protagoras thereby defined humans as the "measure of all things" through our distinctive capacities for language and argument.
The Dialectic Foundations of Western Philosophy
The Socratic tradition beginning in the 5th century BCE held that dialogue involving questioning and the collaborative exploration of ideas was the highest method to induce wisdom and insight into universal definitions, ethical precepts, and justified true beliefs (epistemology). For Socrates, the back-and-forth process of proposing hypotheses, finding contradictions via questioning, revising premises, and moving closer to truth through a form of "mutual criticism" between interlocutors was the very activity that defined the "philosophical" pursuit of knowledge itself.
Plato expanded upon and allegorized the Socratic method of elenchus (cross-examination) through his philosophical dialogues as the basis of truth-seeking dialectic. In works like the Republic, interlocutors would posit theses or definitions which would then be "turned over" through persistent inquiry and counterarguments to progressively approximate greater clarity, logical coherence, and deeper understanding.
This dialectic process involving active listening to opposing perspectives, skillful questioning to scrutinize hidden assumptions and potential contradictions, and the progressive refinement of ideas through reasoned discourse became the essential method of Platonic/Socratic philosophy. As such, it laid the foundations for the evolution of Western logic, epistemology, pedagogy, and rhetoric.
The Medieval Renaissance of Dialectic and Rhetoric
After a period of relative decline following Greco-Roman antiquity, the traditions of dialectic and rhetorical discourse experienced a renaissance beginning in the 11th and 12th century medieval period. With the rediscovery and translation of classical texts, along with the rise of the university and scholastic culture, dialectic reasoning and skills of rhetoric were revived and became the core of the medieval liberal arts curriculum.
In this era, dialectic involving the practices of skillful questioning, logical reasoning, disputation between multiple perspectives, and norms of evidence-based discourse became one of the central activities of medieval intellectual life. In the nascent university setting, the scholastic method involved systematic critiques of authorities and defending competing viewpoints through formal argumentation and debate (via disputatio or later quaestio formats).
In parallel, the disciplined study of logic, rhetoric (including persuasive oratory), and linguistic grammar formed the elementary trivium that laid the groundwork for all subsequent education. These linguistic liberal arts were considered the essential tools for interpreting texts and authorities, constructing arguments, engaging in dialectic, and communicating wisdom.
With rhetoric and dialectic comprising the core of this medieval scholarly milieu for over half a millennium, it instilled cultural values surrounding specific linguistic practices, habits of listening, and standards of reasoned discourse that were inseparable from the intellectual life. This was the formative context that shaped the Western scholastic, philosophical, scientific, and public sphere for centuries to come.
The Early Modern Rhetoric of Civilized Discourses
Across early modern Europe, the norms, ideals, and widespread teaching of rhetoric and dialectic extended into diverse spheres of cultural and political life. From the iterative drafting of pamphlets and speeches to the cut-and-thrust of civil Parliamentary debate to the codification of dialectical forms in new institutions and socio-political arenas, rhetorical persuasion and rules of procedural discourse advanced in prominence.
In 16th century England, professors in newly created Chairs of Rhetoric at Cambridge and Oxford reinforced the university curriculum grounded in classical rhetoric. In the 17th century, education reformers like John Milton advocated for "gymnastic" exercises in debate, rhetoric and "laboured composures" of oratory as vital for "the Reformation of the Order, Art and Exercises of public speaking"--which he considered key to raising citizens for civic participation in government.
These civic pedagogies found fruition in bodies like the British Parliamentary whose fundamental structure of rules, oratory, and adversarial discourse grew out of evolving rhetorical institutions and practices cultivated since the Renaissance era. Through the 18th century, Parliamentary debates became events where rhetorical technique, Ciceronian eloquence, and adherence to conventions of logical argumentation were prized attributes of accomplished statesmen and public figures.
Overall, the heightened prominence of widespread rhetoric education combined with new venues for public discourse helped solidify the prestige of substantive dialogue, norms of civil debate, and habits of oratorical listening within English culture up through the Enlightenment period and beyond. Rhetoric provided the systematic scaffolding for elevating the art of civilized, reasoned public conversation itself.
Contemporary Declines in Listening and Dialogic Discourse
However, many modern critics and observers have lamented that the very linguistic capacities and cultural practices imbuing active listening, authentic dialogue, and standards for rigorous public discourse appear to have atrophied and eroded over the past decades and centuries.
In formal educational contexts, while rhetoric and logic were once core liberal arts in the medieval curriculum, explicit training in the different types of listening and dialectic skills of dialogic exchange have diminished in modern schooling. According to Yale Professor Christine Courtois, many students now exhibit severe deficiencies "really listening to each other's ideas and arguments" in the classroom.
Some critics argue that the Socratic art of skillful questioning and dialectic to inspire genuine inquiry, self-reflection, and critical examination of core assumptions and beliefs has been largely lost in mainstream pedagogy. In John Taylor Gatto's analysis, teachers themselves are often not trained in "critical thinking of any kind" nor "the dialectic of Socrates or朱子 [Zhu Xi]" to cultivate these habits in students.
In terms of public discourse, thinkers as diverse as Michael Oakeshott, Jurgen Habermas, and Bernard Lonergan have contended that the substantive practices of reasoned conversation upholding norms of logic, fair hearing of opposing views, charitable interpretation, and earnest truth-seeking have degenerated. Rather than thoughtful consideration of the strongest counterarguments, rhetoric is often deployed merely for partisan "point-scoring" and adversarial "eristic" rather than truth-seeking (Lonergan).
According to contemporary philosopher Kwasi Wiredu, the modern public sphere has devolved back towards more ancient "pre-logical" paradigms exhibiting informal fallacies and assumptions rooted in ethnocentric dogma rather than genuine exchange and shared standards of reason. Even among elites and intelligentsia, Wiredu contends "logical thinking and logical principles of discourse" remain obscure compared to the dialectical rigor of previous eras.
Other prominent voices across fields of politics, journalism, philosophy, and beyond have echoed similar concerns that genuine practices of listening, introspection, questioning core assumptions, following logically reasoned arguments, and the general cultural value placed on civil public discourse has deteriorated. In the words of John Munro, a former Dean of Philosophy, "We have lost the art of mastering the craft of language for gaining wisdom, truth and concord."
Some trends potentially contributing to this perceived devolution of linguistic and dialectical norms include:
•The fragmentation of media channels and polarizing dynamics of modern political discourses incentivizing rhetorical spectacle and point-scoring over substantive dialogue
•Growing cultural devaluation of liberal arts education and immersion in canonical rhetorical texts in favor of technical and vocational training
•The emergence and predominance of electronic communications mediums which lack the contextual, bodily co-presence and prosodic qualities catalyzing more connected forms of discourse
• Psychological dispositions and cognitive biases observable across cultures, eras, and types of discourse promoting defensive listening, selective attention biases, and adversarial postures over mutual understanding
• Cultural and systemic pressures in spheres like politics, law, and media privileging persuasive speech tailored towards influencing audiences over disinterested truth-seeking
• The loss of initiation into formative practices and institutions (schools, salons, civic forums, etc.) which historically instilled habits of rhetoric, dialectic, and appreciation for substantive public conversation as signifiers of cultured society
• Fragmentation of shared linguistic and epistemic norms amidst globalized cultural diversities, undermining stable foundations for common discourse
• The centrifugal forces of individualism and expressive perspectives subverting collective linguistic disciplining towards unified rhetorical ideals
• Postmodern critiques and destabilization of concepts like objective Truth, Reason, and unified subjectivities -- cornerstones underlying classical dialectical traditions
Potential Consequences
If such critiques identifying a substantive devolution in dialogic literacy and conversational norms hold merit, the implications could be profoundly impactful across domains. In the realm of education, the diminished capacity for developing dialectical reasoning, self-reflective questioning, and skills of substantive discourse among students could undermine preparation for future roles in fields premised on such abilities -- from law, academics, journalism and public policy to even philosophy and the sciences themselves.
Within the public sphere, the degradation of shared linguistic practices and reasoned debate could accelerate societal fragmentation and impede capacities for cooperative sensemaking, collective intelligence, and democratic discourse. As philosopher Michael Oakeshott warned, when rhetoric and dialectic break down, societies can slide towards either rationalistic individualism or collectivist belonging rooted in mythological/"anti-logic" assumptions -- with disastrous consequences.
Ultimately, some of the core aims historically motivating the development of dialogic practices -- the collaborative pursuit of truth, mutual understanding, and reconciliation of differing perspectives -- could be imperiled amidst prevailing tendencies towards monological speaking over active listening, assumptions over questioning, rhetorical spectacle over cooperative reasoning.
Potential Recourses
To counter such trends, various thinkers have advocated for renewed efforts at pedagogical, cultural, and systemic levels to revive and reinvigorate the linguistic arts of dialogic discourse. Proposals have included:
• Redesigning education curricula to teach multi-modal literacies in rhetoric, logic, and the diverse arts of dialogue/dialectic from Socratic inquiry to parliamentary debate
• Integrating contemplative practices and character formation to instill virtues of humility, openness, and deeper listening as prerequisites for higher reasoning
• Cultivating communities of courteous discourse bound by norms of civic friendship and truth-seeking in salons, public forums, and productive controversies
• Restoring initiation into canons of profound dialogues (Platonic, Zen koans, monastic questioning, etc.) as embodied exemplars across civilizations
• Adapting timeless dialectic techniques to contemporary media contexts to develop "new rhetorics" for digital discourse and collaborative knowledge platforms
Ultimately, many scholars and observers contend that the practices of listening, questioning, and authentic dialogue are not merely instrumentally valuable - but reflect the core of what defines human linguistic flourishing and sapience itself.
As the pioneering psychologist Lev Vygotsky presciently observed, "Thought is not merely expressed in words; it comes into existence through them." By revitalizing our dialogic capabilities, we may open new horizons for interpersonal understanding, collective reasoning, and the collaborative co-construction of ideas and knowledge to address the immense challenges facing
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!