In an era where educational reform continues to be a pressing concern, one teacher's 23-year track record of exceptional student achievement offers valuable insights into what truly works in the classroom. While the 2010 documentary "Waiting for Superman" highlighted the systemic challenges in American education, the story of Mr. Taylor demonstrates that transformative education isn't about waiting for a superhero—it's about implementing proven, research-based practices consistently and systematically.
The Evidence of Success
In a Title I school with high populations of English Language Learners and special education students, Mr. Taylor's classroom has consistently outperformed district and state averages. Perhaps most notably, his classes have achieved remarkable growth with students who previously struggled, including those reading several grade levels behind or lacking basic numeracy skills. Parents describe getting their child into his class as "winning the lottery," while his classes routinely transform students who have spent years without meaningful academic progress.
The Foundation: Research-Based Programs
The foundation of this success story begins with two revolutionary programs that shaped Mr. Taylor's early teaching career: Success for All (SFA) and the original University of Chicago Mathematics Project (UCSMP), known as Everyday Mathematics.
Success for All: A Comprehensive Approach
SFA represented more than just a reading program—it was a complete school reform model built on several key pillars:
SFA is a whole-school approach that combines:
- Instruction emphasizing beginning and foundational literacy skills and cooperative learning
- One-to-small group tutoring for students who need it in the primary grades
- Frequent progress monitoring, assessment, and clear regrouping based on MTSS
- Mandatory parent involvement
- Distributed leadership
- Extensive training and ongoing coaching
- 1. Mandatory Parent Engagement
- Clear accountability structures
- Regular communication and support for all stakeholders
2. Systematic Progress Monitoring FULL MTSS
- Research-validated assessment tools (DIBELS, Brigance Inventory, Woodcock-Johnson, and... )
- Regular data collection and analysis for MTSS
- Targeted interventions based on student performance
3. Clear Role Separation
- Teachers focused solely on the best instructional strategies
Schools are resembling Baskin Robbins, but instead of 31 flavors, they now offer 331. They continuously add new strategies, tasks, and requirements without conducting any meaningful praxis analysis to determine their effectiveness. Moreover, finding any relevant white papers or research on these initiatives is nearly impossible.- Administration handled chronic academic and behavioral issues
- Regular administrative support and oversight targeted at student and parent participation
The University of Chicago Mathematics Project approached math instruction through:
- Spiral curriculum design
- Focus on deep number sense
- Integration of problem-solving skills
- Emphasis on mathematical thinking
- Student engagement through authentic applications
The Taylor Method: Five Key Must-Do Elements of Success
Drawing from these foundational programs and two decades of classroom experience, Mr. Taylor's approach incorporates five essential elements that drive student success:
1. Structured Cooperative Learning (Kagan)/WBT)
- Mandated participation from all students NO OPT-OUT, NO BYSTANDING, NO SPECTATING!
- Interdependent learning relationships
- Clear roles, rules, expectations, and responsibilities
- No "bystander EVER" option in learning
2. Multi-Modal Engagement
- Educational games are a priority FULL TPR and WBT!
- Brain breaks
- Music and Singing integration
- Active learning strategies TPR
3. Systematic/Mandatory Parent Involvement
- Regular communication
- Structured support systems peer and cooperative grouping
- Accountability measures
4. Data-Driven Progress Monitoring (BRIGANCE)
- Regular assessment that shows trends
- Targeted interventions (READING BOOT CAMP)
- Clear growth metrics
- Individualized support
5. Structured Classroom Management (KAGAN/WBT)
- Clear expectations
- Consistent routines
- Supportive environment
- Focus on learning
BONUS! 6. The classroom as the third teacher, the Atelier, the studio, the workshop, the maker space. the hobby shop. the game room.
Despite consistent evidence of effectiveness, Mr. Taylor's methods have faced skepticism from the administration rather than being embraced as a model for replication. This highlights a concerning disconnect in educational leadership: when presented with clear evidence of success, particularly with challenging student populations, some administrators focus on questioning the results rather than learning from them.
A Call for System-Wide Implementation
The success of Mr. Taylor's classroom shouldn't be an anomaly or a "lottery win" for fortunate students. The methods he employs are neither proprietary nor revolutionary—they are well-researched, evidence-based practices that have been proven effective through both academic research and practical application. The real question isn't why these methods work, but rather why they aren't being systematically implemented across entire school districts.
Simon Sinek's insights into organizational decline provide a crucial framework for understanding one of the most challenging aspects of educational transformation: the behavioral adaptations students develop in failing systems. In institutions experiencing decline, individuals typically respond with three defensive behaviors: lying, hiding, and faking. In educational settings, this manifests as academic dishonesty, disengagement, and surface-level compliance without real learning.
The Challenge of Behavioral Transformation
As Mr. Taylor's experience demonstrates, breaking these entrenched behaviors presents perhaps the most formidable challenge in educational reform. Students who have spent years in struggling educational environments often develop deeply ingrained habits of:
- Academic dishonesty
- Passive spectatorship
- Disengagement from learning
- Surface-level compliance
- Avoidance behaviors
The process of reversing these patterns can take anywhere from one quarter to three quarters of consistent intervention—and sometimes longer. This transformation requires:
- Unwavering consistency
- Clear structures and expectations
- Supportive environment
- Focus on finding student purpose
The Unique Classroom Dynamic
Mr. Taylor's classroom represents a unique case study in this transformation process. With up to 50% or more of students having 504s, IEPs, special education requirements, or requiring other interventions, his classroom often serves as a microcosm of the most pressing challenges in education. Yet through structured support and high expectations, these students consistently achieve exceptional growth.
Finding Purpose in Learning
Drawing from Simon Sinek's emphasis on "finding your why," the approach focuses on helping students:
- Discover their personal motivation for learning
- Build authentic engagement with education
- Develop genuine academic integrity
- Transform from spectators to active participants
- Connect with their individual purpose
The Role of Structure and Support
The success in breaking these patterns stems from:
- Clear, consistent rules and expectations
- Structured learning environments
- High academic and behavioral standards
- Understanding of special education needs
- Focus on individual student growth
- Continuous support and encouragement
This transformation from disengagement to active participation represents the most challenging yet crucial aspect of educational reform. It requires not just academic intervention, but a complete reshaping of student attitudes toward learning and their own capabilities.
The success of this approach, particularly with students facing significant challenges, reinforces the potential for transformation when evidence-based practices are combined with a deep understanding of student psychology and behavior. It's not just about teaching content—it's about rebuilding trust in the educational process itself and helping students rediscover their capacity for genuine learning and growth.
Case Study: Maslow Before Bloom - A Teacher's Perspective
In recent years, I've faced administrative scrutiny for a practice that, while unconventional, speaks to the heart of effective education: prioritizing students' psychological needs before their academic achievements. This approach, grounded in the principle of "Maslow before Bloom," has become a cornerstone of my classroom's success story.
The Alacrity-Accolades Connection
In my classroom, students learn a fundamental life lesson: enthusiasm (alacrity) breeds recognition (accolades). This isn't just a classroom management strategy—it's a reflection of how success works in the real world. When students demonstrate:
- Genuine enthusiasm for learning
- Purposeful engagement
- Passionate participation
- Eager involvement in tasks
They receive tangible recognition through:
- Verbal praise and recognition
- "Noodle" rewards (special privileges)
- Extra time for handicrafts
- Additional support and attention
- Special classroom responsibilities
Administrative Pushback
This approach hasn't always aligned with traditional administrative expectations. I've been called to defend my practice of sometimes prioritizing these behavioral reinforcements over expected norms or academic demands. The criticism typically centers on the uninformed or biased perceptions that when examined never hold up to real facts and scrutiny.
The Psychology Behind the Practice
However, this strategy is firmly grounded in educational psychology. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs demonstrates that before students can engage in higher-level learning (Bloom's Taxonomy), their fundamental psychological needs must be met:
- Safety and Security
- Belonging and connection
- Self-esteem and recognition
- Purpose and meaning
Real-World Parallels
This system mirrors real-world professional environments where:
- Enthusiasm leads to opportunities
- Initiative results in recognition
- Passion drives advancement
- Purpose fuels success
Breaking the Cycle of Failure
For students who have experienced years of academic failure, this approach serves as a crucial intervention. By creating a direct connection between positive behavior (alacrity) and positive outcomes (accolades), we:
- Build intrinsic motivation
- Develop self-efficacy
- Create positive associations with learning
- Establish healthy work habits
- Foster emotional security
The Results
The effectiveness of this approach is evident in student outcomes. When students feel recognized and rewarded for their enthusiasm and effort:
- Engagement increases
- Academic performance improves
- Behavioral issues decrease
- Classroom culture strengthens
- Learning becomes self-motivated
A Defense of the Practice
While this approach may seem unconventional to some administrators, it addresses a fundamental truth in education: students won't progress through Bloom's taxonomy of learning until their basic psychological needs are met. By creating a classroom environment where enthusiasm is consistently recognized and rewarded, we:
- Build student confidence
- Create psychological safety
- Develop intrinsic motivation
- Foster a growth mindset
- Prepare students for real-world success
The criticism this approach receives often stems from a misunderstanding of the deep connection between emotional security and academic achievement. By prioritizing "Maslow before Bloom," we're not neglecting academic standards—we're creating the psychological foundation necessary for academic success.
This strategy has proven particularly effective with students who have experienced repeated academic failure. By breaking the cycle of disappointment and replacing it with a clear connection between positive behavior and positive outcomes, we create an environment where both personal growth and academic achievement can flourish.
The results speak for themselves: students who understand that their enthusiasm and effort will be consistently recognized and rewarded become more engaged, more confident learners who are better prepared for both academic challenges and real-world success.
The transformation of struggling students into successful learners shouldn't depend on the luck of classroom assignment. The evidence-based practices employed in Mr. Taylor's classroom—drawn from proven programs like SFA and the original Everyday Mathematics, and refined through years of successful implementation—provide a clear blueprint for systematic improvement in student outcomes. The challenge now lies not in discovering what works, but in scaling these proven methods across entire school systems.
Rather than waiting for Superman—or Mr. Taylor—we need to embrace and implement the evidence-based practices that have consistently demonstrated success. The future of our students depends not on finding new solutions, but on implementing the proven ones we already have.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!