Friday, October 9, 2026

Challenging Behavior in Children: Practical Strategies for Parents and Teachers

Your Child Isn’t “Bad,” “Defiant,” or “Difficult”: What Parents and Teachers Can Teach Instead

Instead of using negative labels like "defiant" or "spoiled" when children act out, adults should view behavior as a form of communication that highlights a missing skill or an unmet need. The text emphasizes that effective guidance relies on connection before correction, balancing warmth with predictable boundaries rather than resorting to punitive measures or complete permissiveness. By focusing on explicit instruction, adults can teach children vital competencies such as emotional regulation, respectful communication, and problem-solving. Both parents and teachers can utilize practical routines—like meaningful choices, transition warnings, and repair conversations—to help children navigate frustration and build genuine independence. Ultimately, the approach champions accountability without shame, ensuring that adults maintain firm limits while preserving a child's dignity and fostering long-term success.

Your Child Isn’t “Bad,” “Defiant,” or “Difficult”: What Parents and Teachers Can Teach Instead PRESENTATIOM SLIDES

A Reading Sage | The Joy Engine Guide to Understanding Behavior, Building Boundaries, and Helping Children Thrive

By Sean Taylor, M.Ed. | Reading Sage — Real Reading. Lasting Joy.

Children don't arrive knowing how to manage frustration, negotiate disagreements, accept disappointment, organize their work, or regulate their emotions. These are learned skills. Our job is to teach them.

The Question Every Parent and Teacher Should Ask

When a child argues, refuses to follow directions, melts down over a seemingly insignificant problem, or repeatedly pushes against classroom rules, adults often reach for familiar labels:

  • Defiant.

  • Disrespectful.

  • Spoiled.

  • Manipulative.

  • Strong-willed.

  • A behavior problem.

But what happens when we replace the label with a question?

What is this child communicating, what skill might be missing, and what can we teach next?

That change in perspective can transform the way adults respond to challenging behavior at home and school.

After 26 years in education, including teaching children with disabilities and struggling readers, I've learned that a child who cannot yet do something independently is not necessarily a child who refuses to learn. Sometimes the child lacks the skill. Sometimes the environment is overwhelming. Sometimes the expectation is unclear, the task feels impossible, or the child has learned that arguing delays an unpleasant activity.

And sometimes a child is testing a boundary because previous experiences have taught them that the boundary might move.

These possibilities require different responses. Good teaching begins by figuring out which response is needed.

The goal isn't to excuse every behavior. It's to understand the behavior well enough to teach something better.

The Joy Engine: Loving Warmth, "DEMANDING" Structure, and the Dignity of the Child

The Joy Engine begins with a simple principle:

Children need both connection and boundaries.

Connection without boundaries can leave children uncertain about expectations. Boundaries without connection can turn ordinary mistakes into battles over power, shame, and control.

Children thrive when adults provide:

  • Belonging: I am safe, valued, and part of this community.

  • Predictability: I understand the routines and what happens next.

  • Agency: I have meaningful choices and opportunities to contribute.

  • Practice: I can learn difficult skills with support.

  • Accountability: My actions matter, and I can repair harm.

  • Joy: Learning, cooperation, creativity, and discovery are part of everyday life.

A compassionate classroom is not a classroom without rules. It is a classroom where expectations are understandable, reasonable, consistently taught, and enforced without humiliation.

We can be kind without giving in. We can be firm without being frightening. We can hold a boundary while preserving a child's dignity.

That is the difference between controlling a child and teaching a child.

Eight Common Behavior Challenges—and What Adults Can Teach Instead

1. When Arguing Becomes a Strategy

What adults see: A child debates every direction, challenges every correction, or continues arguing after a decision has been made.

What the child may have learned: Arguing sometimes delays the task, earns additional attention, or eventually changes the adult's answer.

What to teach: Respectful disagreement, listening, negotiation, and how to accept a decision.

Try this at home or school:

  1. Give one brief, specific direction.

  2. Allow reasonable processing time.

  3. Acknowledge the child's concern without reopening a settled decision.

  4. Offer a choice when a choice is genuinely available.

For example:

"I hear that you want another five minutes. It's time to put the game away. Would you like to put it away yourself or have me help?"

If the child continues arguing, avoid launching into a lengthy lecture. Calmly repeat the essential expectation and follow through.

Joy Engine principle: Teach communication rather than rewarding an argument with endless negotiation.

2. When Rules Seem Negotiable

What adults see: A child follows classroom routines one day and challenges them the next.

What might be happening: Expectations may be inconsistent, directions may be unclear, or the child may have discovered that different adults enforce different rules. The child may also struggle with transitions, impulse control, or understanding why a rule matters.

What to teach: Predictable routines, responsibility, and the difference between a rule and a preference.

Classroom-ready strategy: Create three classroom agreements.

Instead of displaying twenty rules that nobody remembers, collaboratively develop three positively stated agreements:

  • Respect people and materials.

  • Take responsibility for your learning.

  • Help make our classroom safe and welcoming.

Teach what each agreement looks and sounds like. Model it, role-play it, and revisit it after problems occur.

Post a visual schedule and give advance notice before transitions. Apply expectations consistently across ordinary situations, while making reasonable accommodations for individual needs.

Joy Engine principle: Consistency is not rigidity. Fairness means dependable expectations and appropriate support.

3. When Consequences Don't Seem to Work

What adults see: The child repeats the same behavior despite losing privileges, receiving warnings, or being sent away from an activity.

What adults may be missing: The consequence might not teach the skill the child needs. It may occur too long after the behavior, be difficult to connect to the action, or unintentionally reward avoidance.

What to teach: Cause and effect, reflection, repair, and an alternative behavior.

Try a simple reflection conversation:

  • What happened?

  • What were you trying to do or communicate?

  • Who was affected?

  • What could you try next time?

  • Is there anything you need to repair?

Keep the conversation brief, concrete, and appropriate to the child's developmental level.

If a child throws classroom materials, for example, the response might include making the area safe, helping restore it when appropriate, and practicing how to ask for a break or assistance.

A consequence should be related, respectful, and reasonable. It should not involve humiliation, threats, or withholding basic needs.

Joy Engine principle: Accountability should help a child learn what to do differently—not simply feel bad about what happened.

4. When Adults Eventually Give In

What adults see: A child escalates from complaining to shouting, crying, or refusing until an adult changes the answer.

What may be happening: The child may have learned that escalation sometimes changes the outcome. But intense reactions can also reflect genuine distress, anxiety, sensory overload, fatigue, or difficulty regulating emotions.

What to teach: How to tolerate disappointment, request help, and recover from frustration.

Adults can practice this before the next difficult moment.

For example:

"I know you are disappointed. You wanted the blue marker, and someone else is using it. You can wait, choose another color, or ask when it will be available."

When a child is overwhelmed, reduce language and prioritize safety and regulation. Teach and revisit problem-solving once the child is calm enough to participate.

Adults should follow through on reasonable boundaries, but they should also reconsider expectations when new information shows that a demand is inappropriate or inaccessible.

Joy Engine principle: A boundary can remain firm while our response remains compassionate.

5. When Persistence Turns Into a Power Struggle

What adults see: A child keeps pushing, repeating a demand, or trying to get the last word.

What to investigate: Is the child seeking control because other parts of the day feel unpredictable? Is the task too difficult? Does the child need more autonomy, movement, sensory support, or a clearer way to express disagreement?

Persistence can be a tremendous strength. We don't want to extinguish curiosity, determination, or independent thinking. We want to help children direct those qualities constructively.

Try a choice within a boundary:

  • "You need to complete the first two problems. Would you like to write the answers or explain them to me first?"

  • "It's time to clean up. Would you like to put away the blocks or the art materials?"

  • "We need to solve this disagreement without hurting anyone. Would you like to explain your side first, or listen to your classmate first?"

Not every task offers a choice, and adults should not manufacture choices when safety is at stake. But meaningful choices can reduce unnecessary conflict and build independence.

Joy Engine principle: Preserve a child's agency while teaching responsibility.

6. When Boundaries Are Repeatedly Pushed

What adults see: A child interrupts, touches other people's belongings, ignores personal space, or repeats an action after being told to stop.

What to teach: Consent, personal space, impulse control, and how to recognize other people's needs.

Practice the skills when everyone is calm. Use clear language:

  • "Stop means stop."

  • "Ask before borrowing."

  • "You can be angry without hitting."

  • "You may disagree, but you may not threaten someone."

In the classroom, role-play common situations. Practice what to say when a classmate takes a pencil, declines to play, or asks for space.

If a boundary is crossed, intervene promptly and protect the person affected. Help the child repair the harm when appropriate.

Joy Engine principle: Boundaries protect everyone's dignity, not just the authority of the adult.

7. When a Child Hears “No” as the End of the World

What adults see: A child becomes distressed when denied a toy, screen, preferred activity, or desired outcome.

What to teach: Emotional vocabulary, flexible thinking, and coping with disappointment.

Start by acknowledging the feeling without promising the requested outcome.

"You really wanted to keep playing. It's hard to stop when you're having fun. We are finishing now, and we can plan when you'll play again."

Then teach a small set of coping strategies:

  • Take a few slow breaths with an adult.

  • Ask for help.

  • Request a brief, appropriate break.

  • Choose an acceptable alternative.

  • Use words to explain disappointment.

Practice these skills during low-stress moments. Don't expect a child to demonstrate a newly taught coping strategy perfectly during a major meltdown.

And remember: adults can respect a child's refusal to participate in a nonessential activity while still enforcing necessary safety and care requirements.

Joy Engine principle: Feelings are welcome. Not every action is acceptable, and not every request can be granted.

8. When Adults Fix Everything for the Child

What adults see: A child gives up quickly, expects an adult to solve every problem, or struggles to begin without constant prompting.

What may be happening: The child may have had too few opportunities to practice independence—or may be facing a task that is genuinely too difficult.

What to teach: Problem-solving, persistence, planning, and help-seeking.

Use the following sequence:

  1. Pause: Give the child time to think.

  2. Prompt: "What have you tried?"

  3. Offer a clue: Provide just enough assistance to get started.

  4. Practice together: Model one step if necessary.

  5. Release responsibility: Let the child complete the next step.

  6. Reflect: "What helped you solve it?"

For struggling readers, this could mean helping a child decode a word instead of immediately supplying it. For a math student, it might mean using counters or a number line. For a social conflict, it could mean helping children generate two possible solutions.

Independence grows through supported practice, not abandonment.

Joy Engine principle: Help children become capable, not dependent on adults to rescue them from every challenge.

The Reading Sage Classroom: Five Routines Teachers Can Use Tomorrow

The ideas above become meaningful when they show up in daily practice. Teachers don't need another expensive program to start teaching communication, self-regulation, and responsibility.

They need a few dependable routines.

Routine 1: The Morning Connection

Welcome students by name. Offer a brief check-in, a friendly greeting, or a choice of how to say hello.

Ask: "What is one thing you hope goes well today?"

For students who aren't ready to talk, allow a visual response, drawing, or private check-in.

A morning connection doesn't eliminate behavioral challenges. It helps establish that students belong before they are asked to perform.

Routine 2: The Two-Minute Transition

Before changing activities:

  • Give a clear warning.

  • State what is ending and what comes next.

  • Show the visual schedule.

  • Give students a small classroom job.

  • Praise specific examples of cooperation.

Instead of shouting, "Everybody hurry up!" try:

"In two minutes, our reading workshop ends. Put your book in the basket, return your pencil, and meet at the rug. You can be our book collector or our materials checker."

For students who need additional transition support, use an individualized visual cue or extra processing time.

Routine 3: The Calm-Down and Return Plan

Create a classroom plan for moments when students become overwhelmed.

Agree on a safe, supervised place where a student can regulate when appropriate. Provide simple options such as breathing, drawing, quiet reading, or asking an adult for help.

Then explicitly teach how to return to learning.

A break is not a punishment, and it shouldn't become an indefinite exclusion from instruction. Students may need adult support, accommodations, or a different response depending on the situation.

Routine 4: The Repair Conversation

After a conflict, use four questions:

  1. What happened?

  2. Who was affected?

  3. What needs to happen now?

  4. What will help next time?

A forced apology is not the same as learning empathy. Sometimes repair means returning an item, helping rebuild something, making a plan, or giving another person space.

The aim is to restore safety and relationships while teaching responsibility.

Routine 5: The Daily Dose of Joy

Every day, make room for something that allows children to experience competence, curiosity, and cooperation.

It might be a song, a read-aloud, an art project, a cooperative game, a science investigation, a building challenge, or a few minutes of movement.

For some children, especially those who have experienced repeated academic failure, joy and successful participation can make the classroom feel more approachable.

Joy is not a substitute for explicit instruction or appropriate behavioral support. It is part of building a learning environment where children can engage, practice, and grow.

What Parents Can Do at Home

Parents can use the same principles without turning home into a school or every disagreement into a lesson.

Make expectations clear. A small number of predictable household routines are easier to follow than a long list of rules that change depending on an adult's mood.

Say what the child can do. Instead of "Stop making a mess," try "Keep the blocks on the floor mat." Instead of "Don't be rude," try "Tell me what you need without insulting your brother."

Follow through calmly. Avoid making threats in the heat of the moment. Set reasonable limits you can maintain.

Build independence gradually. Let children help prepare a snack, organize a backpack, solve a small disagreement, or complete a manageable household task.

Notice the behavior you want to grow. Be specific: "You were frustrated, but you asked for help instead of throwing the pencil."

Repair your own mistakes. Adults lose their patience, too. Saying "I raised my voice, and that wasn't helpful. I'm sorry. Let's try again" models accountability rather than undermining authority.

Most importantly, remember that a child who struggles at school may be using every bit of energy available just to get through the day. Sleep, hunger, stress, transitions, learning difficulties, sensory needs, and changes at home can all affect behavior.

If difficulties are persistent, severe, or interfere significantly with learning and relationships, collaborate with the school and consider whether additional assessment or support is needed.

A Critical Reminder: Not Every Behavior Is a Choice

We must be careful not to replace one harmful label with another.

A child who struggles with self-regulation is not automatically spoiled. But neither is every challenging behavior evidence of a different brain, a hidden disability, or an unmet need.

Some children need explicit instruction in social skills. Others need accommodations, more accessible academic tasks, additional practice, consistent routines, or support from a qualified professional. Many need several of these at once.

Children with ADHD, autism, dyslexia, language difficulties, trauma histories, or other developmental differences may encounter particular barriers, but children are individuals. We should investigate rather than assume.

For example, a student who refuses to read aloud may be avoiding embarrassment over decoding difficulties. A student who leaves a seat repeatedly may need movement, support with attention, or a more accessible task. A student who argues about directions may need clearer instructions—or may simply be learning to handle disagreement appropriately.

Behavior is information, not a diagnosis.

Observe patterns, consider context, ask the child what is happening, and collaborate with families and specialists when needed.

Compassion and accountability work best when they are informed by evidence.

The Joy Engine: From Compliance to Capability

There is an important difference between a child who behaves appropriately because an adult is watching and a child who is gradually learning to make thoughtful decisions independently.

We cannot teach every life skill through a consequence. We cannot lecture a child into emotional regulation. And we cannot build genuine independence by solving every problem on the child's behalf.

We have to teach, model, practice, and revisit.

That is true for reading. It is true for mathematics. It is true for classroom cooperation, conflict resolution, and self-regulation.

A child who cannot yet decode a word needs instruction and practice, not shame. A child who cannot yet manage frustration needs support and practice, not simply another lecture. A child who hurts someone needs a clear boundary, protection for the person harmed, and appropriate teaching and accountability.

The response depends on the child, the behavior, and the circumstances.

At Reading Sage, the goal is not to eliminate every difficult moment. It is to create the conditions in which children can learn from those moments.

We want children who can read, reason, create, cooperate, recover from mistakes, and think for themselves.

We want adults who can hold boundaries without humiliating children and offer compassion without abandoning responsibility.

We want classrooms where curiosity is welcomed, differences are understood, and every child has a meaningful opportunity to grow.

Raise readers. Raise thinkers. Raise humans.

The Reading Sage Takeaway

The next time a child argues, refuses, melts down, or pushes a boundary, pause before reaching for a label.

Ask three questions:

  1. What happened before the behavior?

  2. What skill, support, or boundary is needed right now?

  3. How can I help this child practice a better response?

You may still need to say no. You may still need to enforce a rule. You may need to stop unsafe behavior immediately.

But you can do all of those things without making a child feel that their identity is the problem.

Children deserve adults who see both their potential and their responsibility to learn.

That is the work of teaching. That is the heart of The Joy Engine.

Under The Joy Engine framework, balancing warmth and boundaries relies on a core principle: children need both connection and boundaries to thrive[1][2]. Connection without boundaries leaves children feeling uncertain about expectations, while boundaries without connection turns ordinary mistakes into battles over power, control, and shame[2].

Adults can maintain both kindness and firmness—holding expectations high while protecting the child's dignity—through several key practices:

1. Name the Feeling, Hold the Line

A calm response can hold both emotional validation and a firm limit: **"I understand, and the limit stays"**[3]. Validate what the child is experiencing without changing the outcome[4].

  • Example: "You really wanted ten more minutes. That is disappointing. It is still time to go."[3]

2. Offer Choices Within a Fixed Boundary

Preserve the child’s agency without lowering expectations by offering two acceptable choices[3][5]. Choice honors autonomy while keeping the expectation fixed[3].

  • Example: "You can put the blocks on the shelf, or in the bin. You choose."[3]
  • Example: "You need to complete the first two problems. Would you like to write the answers or explain them to me first?"[5]

3. Tell the Child What They Can Do

Instead of constantly issuing negative commands, state expectations positively so the child understands the replacement behavior[6].

  • Example: Try "Keep the blocks on the floor mat" instead of "Stop making a mess," or "Tell me what you need without insulting your brother" instead of "Don't be rude"[6].

4. Practice Connection Before Correction

Establish that the child safe, valued, and belongs before asking them to perform or adjust behavior[7]. Simple routines like greeting a child warmly by name or validating their effort establish connection early[9][10].

5. Follow Through Calmly and Predictably

Avoid long lectures, repeated warnings, or angry threats in the heat of the moment[6][11]. State the direction briefly, allow processing time, and repeat the expectation calmly while following through every time[3][11]. Predictable routines prevent boundaries from feeling arbitrary or negotiable[6][12].

6. Focus on Repair Over Punishment

Accountability should teach missing skills rather than make the child feel bad about who they are[1]. After a conflict, use brief reflection conversations rather than forced apologies[15][16]:

  1. What happened?[15][16]
  2. Who was affected?[15][16]
  3. What needs to happen now?[16]
  4. What will help next time?[15][16]

7. Regulate Adult Self-Talk

A depleted or dysregulated adult will often read normal child behavior as defiance[17]. Adults must extend the same compassion to themselves—swapping harsh self-labels ("I'm losing control") for objective camera-style descriptions ("It's bedtime after a long day") and stepping back to regulate[18]

Here is a step-by-step script for handling transition meltdowns, grounded in The Joy Engine framework's approach to balancing warmth with firm boundaries.


Step 1: Give Advance Notice (Before the Transition)

Being pulled mid-play without advance notice can feel like an injustice to a child, so transition support starts before the change happens[1].

  • State the timeline clearly[2]**:**

> *"In two minutes, our [current activity] ends and it will be time for [next activity]"*[2].

  • Offer a small job to foster agency[2]**:**

> *"You can be our materials checker or carry the basket to the shelf. Which job would you like?"*[2]


Step 2: Transition Point (Acknowledge Feeling & Give Choices)

When it is time to switch tasks, acknowledge their emotional state while keeping the boundary fixed[3].

  • Name the feeling and hold the line[3]**:**

> *"You really wanted to keep playing. It's hard to stop when you're having fun. We are finishing now, and we can plan when you'll play again"*[4].

  • Offer choices within the fixed boundary[3]**:**

> *"It is time to put the game away. Would you like to put it away yourself, or would you like me to help?"*[6]


Step 3: During Resistance or Meltdown (De-escalation & Firm Boundaries)

If the child resists or begins to melt down, avoid long lectures, repeated warnings, or angry threats[6][7]. Reduce your language to prioritize safety and regulation[8].

  • Repeat the boundary calmly without arguing[3]**:**

> *"I hear that you want five more minutes. That is disappointing, and the limit stays—it is time to go"*[3].

  • State what the child can do rather than issuing negative commands[9][10]**:**

> Try "Keep your feet on the rug" instead of "Stop jumping," or *"Tell me what you need without shouting"*[9][10].

  • Offer a simple coping strategy or quiet space[4][11]**:**

> "Take a few slow breaths with me" or *"You can sit in our quiet spot until your body feels ready to join"*[4][11].


Step 4: Reconnect & Reflect (After Everyone Is Calm)

Accountability should focus on teaching missing self-regulation skills rather than making the child feel bad[7][12]. Once the child is calm, reconnect first[13].

  • Opening phrase[13]**:**

> *"That was a lot. Let's figure out what you needed"*[13].

  • Walk through four brief repair questions[12][14]**:**
    1. *"What happened?"*[12][14]
    2. *"Who was affected?"*[12][14]
    3. *"What needs to happen now?"*[14]
    4. "What will help us next time?"


Practicing connection before correction is rooted in a fundamental principle of The Joy Engine: children need to feel safe, valued, and a sense of belonging before they are asked to perform, adjust their behavior, or follow directions[1]. When adults attempt to correct behavior without first establishing a connection, ordinary discipline often turns into a power struggle that triggers shame, control, and defensiveness[1].

Here is how adults can build and apply connection before correction across daily interactions:


1. Establish Proactive Connection Routines

Connection should be built before behavioral challenges arise, setting a baseline of trust and safety[4].

  • The Morning Connection: Greet each child individually by name with a warm greeting or brief check-in (e.g., "What is one thing you hope goes well today?")[3][5]. This establishes that the child belongs and is valued before any demands or performance expectations are placed on them[4].
  • The Daily Dose of Joy: Incorporate regular opportunities for shared competence, curiosity, and cooperation—such as games, read-alouds, or creative activities[6]. Joy makes the learning environment approachable and reduces friction during difficult moments[6].

2. Connect at the Moment of Conflict

When redirection or boundary enforcement is necessary, lead with emotional validation rather than immediate demands[7].

  • Name the Feeling First: Validate what the child is experiencing before holding the limit[7][9]. For example, say: *"You really wanted to keep playing. It's hard to stop when you're having fun. We are finishing now"*[8][9]. Naming the emotion helps calm the brain's alarm response before enforcing the boundary[7][10].
  • Reframe Behavior as Communication: View disruptive behavior not as an attack or defiance, but as a bid for connection, an unmet need, or a missing regulation skill[11]. Ask yourself: *"She's looking for connection. How can I give it before she has to ask loudly?"*[13].
  • Protect Dignity Privately: Avoid public corrections, warnings, or shouting in front of peers, which forces a child into a fight-or-flight fight for "face"[2]. Offer calm, private support: *"I noticed that was a rough moment. Let's try again"*[13].
  • Offer Controlled Choices: Honor the child’s agency by offering options within the fixed boundary[7]. Saying, "You need to complete two problems. Would you like to write the answers or explain them to me first?" maintains high expectations while showing respect for their autonomy[9][16].

3. Maintain Connection Through Post-Conflict Repair

Connection does not end when a mistake occurs; it continues through the process of restoring the relationship[17].

  • Conduct Brief Reflection Conversations: Once everyone is calm, focus on learning and problem-solving rather than punishment or forced apologies[18]. Walk through four supportive questions[18]:
    1. What happened?
    2. Who was affected?
    3. What needs to happen now?
    4. What will help next time?
  • Model Adult Repair: When adults lose their patience or raise their voice, explicitly apologizing ("I raised my voice, and that wasn't helpful. I'm sorry. Let's try again") demonstrates that relationships remain safe even after a rupture, showing the child how to take responsibility without shame[17][22].

The four questions for repair—used during brief reflection conversations after a conflict once everyone is calm—are[1]:

  1. **What happened?**[1]
  2. **Who was affected?**[1]
  3. **What needs to happen now?**[1]
  4. **What will help next time?**[1]

Instead of issuing forced apologies or punitive measures, walking through these four questions helps children build empathy, take responsibility, and focus on teaching missing problem-solving skills for the future 


Suggested Reading Sage Blog Extras

Challenging Behavior in Children: Practical Strategies for Parents and Teachers

Meta description: Learn practical, compassionate strategies for challenging behavior at home and school. Build consistent boundaries, teach self-regulation, and help children develop independence with The Joy Engine and Reading Sage.

Suggested URL slug: challenging-behavior-children-parents-teachers

Primary keywords: challenging behavior in children, classroom behavior strategies, positive discipline, self-regulation, social-emotional learning, parenting strategies, classroom management.

Suggested featured-image headline:
BEHAVIOR IS INFORMATION. TEACH THE SKILL. KEEP THE BOUNDARY. PROTECT THE RELATIONSHIP.

Suggested closing call to action:
Parents and teachers: What strategy has helped a child move from conflict toward cooperation? Share your experience and help another family or teacher find a practical next step.

The companion video explainer

Teacher Career Transitions: Leveraging Educational Qualifica

Add to Favorites

Video title: Stop Labeling Children. Start Teaching the Missing Skill.

Length: 3–4 minutes · Audience: Parents, classroom teachers, homeschool educators

Open with the familiar labels—“defiant,” “difficult,” “spoiled”—then ask what changes when adults investigate the behavior instead of defining the child by it.

Understanding Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children

Add to Favorites

Middle section: Five things adults can do tomorrow

Visual schedules · Choices within limits · Calm communication · Repair conversations · Supported independence

Show each strategy in a realistic classroom or home example. Make the video useful enough that teachers can try a strategy the next morning.

My First Day at Preschool | Story.com

Add to Favorites

Closing message: Connection before correction; accountability without shame.

Finish with: “Our job isn't to win every power struggle. It's to help children develop the skills to navigate the world with confidence, responsibility, and compassion.”

The visual concept I would use

For the Reading Sage / The Joy Engine graphic, I'd move away from the original's alarm-siren, warning-sign, and punitive feel. Use watercolor illustrations, warm colors, and a two-column design that teachers can actually read.

The headline would be:

YOUR CHILD IS NOT THE PROBLEM. THE BEHAVIOR IS A PLACE TO BEGIN.

Understand the need. Teach the skill. Keep the boundary.

The graphic could pair five common challenges with five concrete adult responses:

When a child…Adults can teach…
ArguesRespectful disagreement
Refuses a taskHelp-seeking and manageable first steps
Becomes overwhelmedRegulation and recovery
Pushes boundariesClear limits and personal responsibility
Expects adults to fix everythingProblem-solving and independence

The footer: Reading Sage × The Joy Engine — Real Tools. Lasting Change.

That gives the concept a more constructive message than suggesting that children simply need to be told “no” more often. It recognizes that children need boundaries, but it also gives parents and teachers something practical to do with that understanding.

Instead of using negative labels like "defiant" or "spoiled" when children act out, adults should view behavior as a form of communication that highlights a missing skill or an unmet need. The text emphasizes that effective guidance relies on connection before correction, balancing warmth with predictable boundaries rather than resorting to punitive measures or complete permissiveness. By focusing on explicit instruction, adults can teach children vital competencies such as emotional regulation, respectful communication, and problem-solving. Both parents and teachers can utilize practical routines—like meaningful choices, transition warnings, and repair conversations—to help children navigate frustration and build genuine independence. Ultimately, the approach champions accountability without shame, ensuring that adults maintain firm limits while preserving a child's dignity and fostering long-term success.

Thursday, October 8, 2026

How to Fix Reading Gaps: Teacher Workshops That Turn Struggling Readers Into Successful Readers

 How to Fix Reading Gaps: Teacher Workshops That Turn Struggling Readers Into Successful Readers

This podcast outlines **Sean Taylor’s Reading Sage Teacher Workshop Series**, which offers research-informed professional development designed to help educators address student reading gaps. The framework emphasizes that schools must **diagnose specific instructional needs** rather than relying on generic interventions or passive lectures. Through targeted strategies focusing on **phonemic awareness, systematic phonics, fluency, and comprehension**, teachers learn to deliver explicit instruction. Furthermore, the approach advocates for a balance between **evidence-based methodologies and joyful learning** to preserve student dignity and engagement. Ultimately, the materials provide a structured twenty-day implementation sprint and collaborative professional development model to transform struggling readers into confident and capable learners.












How to Fix Reading Gaps: Teacher Workshops That Turn Struggling Readers Into Successful Readers

By Sean Taylor, M.Ed. | Reading Sage | Reading Boot Camp

The Reading Sage framework grounds its approach in the core principle that evidence-based instruction and joyful learning are complementary philosophies, not opposing ones[1][2]. Instead of treating joy as a substitute for structured literacy, the framework uses creative, active learning as the vehicle to deliver systematic, explicit instruction[1][3].

The framework combines explicit phonics with joyful learning through several key strategies:

  • Multisensory Phonics ("Phonics Without the Worksheet Factory"): Explicit phonics instruction is delivered through hands-on routines rather than repetitive worksheets[4][5]. Students manipulate letter tiles, build word ladders by changing one sound at a time (e.g., map → mop → shop → chop), use movable alphabets, trace letters in tactile materials like sand, and construct words on pocket charts[5].
  • Active Sound Awareness & Rhythmic Play: Instruction in phonemic awareness and the 44 sounds of English is made concrete and memorable through sound-box games using counters, oral blending and segmenting challenges, singing, and rhythm activities[6][7].
  • Purposeful Fluency Through Performance: Rather than reducing fluency practice to speed drills, the framework uses expressive, cooperative routines like Reader's Theater, poetry, dialogue, songs, and performance[8]. Reader's Theater gives students a natural, engaging reason to reread text—to understand their role and communicate the story to an audience[9].
  • The "Joy Engine" Daily Integration: The framework structures instruction around a "Joy Engine" that pairs explicit phonics mini-lessons directly with brain breaks, board games, word games, cooperative learning structures, and student choice[3][10]. In a sample 90-minute block, explicit phonics and guided decoding lead directly into supported reading and conclude with a review and a joyful closing activity[11].
  • Connecting Skills to Real-World Curiosity: Decoding and vocabulary instruction are connected to rich literature, science, history, art, and hands-on projects[10]. For example, students might build a small model ecosystem in science before reading a passage on food webs, providing background knowledge that makes text meaningful[13].
  • Protecting Learner Dignity: For older struggling readers, explicit multisyllabic decoding and morphology are taught using age-respectful, intellectually engaging materials rather than materials designed for younger children[14][15]. The framework avoids public comparisons, focusing on building student confidence alongside core reading skills[16].

In short, explicit teaching provides the necessary decoding tools, while joyful practice provides the motivation, belonging, and engagement for students to apply those tools[2][3].

The "Become a Reading Detective" workshop (Workshop 1 in the series) focuses on equipping educators to accurately diagnose the root causes of a student's reading difficulties before selecting an intervention[1].

Core Focus & Essential Question

  • Essential Question: *"What is preventing this student from becoming a more capable reader?"*[1]
  • Objective: Teachers learn to listen to students read, analyze decoding attempts, examine specific errors, and distinguish between word recognition difficulties and language comprehension issues[1].

Key Workshop Activities

Participants engage in practical diagnostic activities, including[1]:

  • Analyzing Reading & Spelling Samples: Examining anonymized student reading passages and analyzing spelling patterns to evaluate sound-symbol knowledge[1].
  • Pinpointing Skill Gaps: Identifying specific errors related to letter-sound correspondence, phoneme manipulation, blends, digraphs, vowel patterns, and multisyllabic words[1].
  • Comparing Comprehension: Evaluating a student's oral comprehension versus their independent reading comprehension[1].
  • Reviewing Data: Analyzing screening, diagnostic, and progress-monitoring data[1].
  • Building Case Profiles: Developing concise instructional profiles for student case studies[1].

Workshop Deliverable

Teachers practice asking, *"What specific skill would help this student become a more independent reader?"*[2]. Each participant leaves with a one-page Reading Gap Diagnostic Map identifying student strengths, target instructional priorities, and a plan for collecting further diagnostic evidence when necessary[2].

Workshop 6: Close the Gap for Older Struggling Readers is designed to provide targeted foundational instruction that respects older students' age, interests, intelligence, and dignity[1]. It addresses the core challenge of helping students (such as middle schoolers) who need foundational decoding support without handing them materials that feel designed for first graders[1].

Key ways Workshop 6 supports older readers include:

  • Age-Respectful & Intellectually Engaging Materials: The workshop reinforces that a student's decoding level should never be confused with the limits of their thinking[2]. Instruction uses age-appropriate, meaningful topics while providing access to complex, grade-level ideas through read-alouds, discussions, and scaffolding[1].
  • Multisyllabic Decoding & Morphology: Instruction moves beyond basic phonics to focus on explicit strategies for decoding longer words, including syllable patterns and morphology (roots, prefixes, and suffixes)[1].
  • Comprehensive Skill Integration: Teachers learn to combine multisyllabic decoding with purposeful fluency routines, vocabulary expansion, background knowledge building, and explicit comprehension strategies[1].
  • Supported Access to Challenging Text: Aligned with Institute of Education Sciences (IES) guidance for grades 4–9, the framework incorporates supported reading of challenging texts so older students build foundational skills in context[1][2].

Workshop Deliverable

Teachers construct an intervention sequence that systematically targets foundational reading gaps while maintaining access to intellectually stimulating, age-respectful material[2].

*Practical, research-informed professional development for elementary teachers, reading specialists, interventionists, special education teachers, and school leaders.*

The Reading Gap Is an Instructional Challenge We Can Address


What happens when a fourth grader reads like a first grader? What do we do when a sixth grader can explain complex ideas aloud but cannot independently decode the words on the page? And how do we help students who have spent years in school without acquiring the reading skills they need to succeed?


These are not hypothetical questions. They are challenges that teachers encounter in classrooms every day.


A student may struggle with phonemic awareness, letter-sound relationships, decoding, multisyllabic words, reading fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, or several of these skills at once. Some students may also have dyslexia, dysgraphia, language differences, interrupted instruction, or other learning needs that require individualized support.


**The first step toward closing a reading gap is to identify what the student needs to learn—not simply assign more reading work.**


After 26 years of teaching, I believe that schools need professional development that equips teachers to become skilled reading diagnosticians, responsive instructors, and enthusiastic advocates for their students.


We do not need another day of passive PowerPoint presentations. We need workshops in which teachers practice instructional techniques, analyze student reading behaviors, create hands-on materials, collaborate with colleagues, and leave with lessons they can use the next morning.


This is the purpose of the Reading Sage Teacher Workshop Series: *How to Fix Reading Gaps.*


## Why Traditional Reading Interventions Sometimes Fall Short


A student who cannot decode a word does not necessarily benefit from being told to read it again independently. A student who lacks phonemic awareness may need explicit instruction connecting spoken sounds to letters. A student who reads accurately but slowly may need purposeful fluency practice. A student who reads the words but cannot explain the passage may need vocabulary development, background knowledge, oral language, and explicit comprehension instruction.


These are different instructional problems.


When schools group all struggling readers into one category, they risk providing instruction that is insufficiently targeted to individual needs.


The Institute of Education Sciences offers separate evidence-based guidance for foundational reading instruction in kindergarten through grade 3 and for reading interventions in grades 4–9. The older-student guidance emphasizes multisyllabic decoding, purposeful fluency-building, comprehension, and access to challenging text. These recommendations reinforce the need to match instruction to the reader rather than assume one intervention fits everyone.


Resources:


* [IES: Foundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding, K–3](https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/PracticeGuide/21/)


* [IES: Providing Reading Interventions in Grades 4–9](https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/PracticeGuide/29)


The goal is not to abandon structured literacy, explicit instruction, or systematic phonics. The goal is to teach these skills effectively while preserving the teacher's ability to observe, adapt, and respond to the child.


**Evidence-based instruction and joyful learning are not opposing philosophies.**


## The Reading Sage Teacher Workshop Series


The following workshops can be delivered as a full-day professional-development experience, a multiday institute, or a series of weekly professional learning community sessions.


### Workshop 1: Become a Reading Detective


**Essential question: What is preventing this student from becoming a more capable reader?**


Before choosing an intervention, teachers need to understand the student's current strengths and needs.


Participants learn to examine reading errors, listen to students read, analyze decoding attempts, and distinguish between difficulties with word recognition and difficulties with understanding language.


Workshop activities:


* Analyze anonymized student reading samples.


* Identify errors involving letter-sound correspondence, phoneme manipulation, blends, digraphs, vowel patterns, and multisyllabic words.


* Compare a student's oral comprehension with independent reading comprehension.


* Examine spelling patterns for clues about sound-symbol knowledge.


* Review screening, diagnostic, and progress-monitoring data.


* Develop a concise instructional profile for each case study.


Teachers practice asking a better question: *What specific skill would help this student become a more independent reader?*


**Workshop product:** A one-page Reading Gap Diagnostic Map identifying strengths, instructional priorities, and a plan for collecting additional evidence when needed.


### Workshop 2: Phonemic Awareness and the 44 Sounds of English


Students must learn to recognize and manipulate the sounds in spoken words and connect those sounds to written language. English spelling is complex, and its 26 letters represent sounds through many different patterns.


Teachers explore how to make sound awareness active, concrete, and memorable.


Hands-on activities include:


* Sound boxes using counters, chips, or small objects.


* Oral blending and segmenting games.


* Sound substitution challenges.


* Elkonin-style mapping of spoken sounds to letters.


* Rhyming, alliteration, and syllable games.


* Singing and rhythm activities that help students attend to sounds in language.


For example, teachers might ask students to say *ship*, identify its three phonemes, map those sounds to the letters, and compare it with *shop* and *shut*.


The emphasis is on listening carefully, connecting sounds with print, and gradually transferring those skills to reading and spelling.


**Workshop product:** A collection of ten short phonemic-awareness routines that can be used in whole-group lessons, small groups, and targeted intervention.


### Workshop 3: Phonics Without the Worksheet Factory


Systematic phonics instruction helps students understand relationships between sounds and spellings. However, teachers can provide explicit instruction without reducing the entire reading block to worksheets.


This workshop turns phonics into a multisensory learning experience.


Teachers rotate through stations featuring:


* Movable alphabet letters and word building.


* Letter tiles for constructing and changing words.


* Word sorts organized by spelling patterns.


* Sand, tactile materials, and letter formation.


* Pocket-chart word construction.


* Word ladders that change one sound or spelling pattern at a time.


* Decodable text connected to the phonics patterns being taught.


A teacher might begin with *map*, change it to *mop*, then *shop*, and finally *chop*. Students say the words, manipulate the letters, read the words, and discuss what changed.


For older students, the workshop introduces syllable patterns, meaningful word parts, prefixes, suffixes, and the decoding of longer words.


The essential principle is straightforward: **students need explicit teaching, guided practice, corrective feedback, and opportunities to apply their skills in connected text.**


**Workshop product:** A reusable phonics station kit and a week of lessons aligned to an identified student need.


### Workshop 4: Fluency Is More Than Reading Fast


Reading fluency includes accuracy, appropriate rate, and prosody—the phrasing and expression that help communicate meaning.


A student who races through a passage without understanding it is not demonstrating strong reading fluency. Neither is a student who reads each word accurately but struggles to combine the words into meaningful phrases.


Teachers practice purposeful fluency routines, including:


* Teacher read-alouds followed by student practice.


* Echo reading.


* Choral reading.


* Partner reading with specific feedback.


* Repeated reading of short, meaningful passages.


* Reader's Theater.


* Poetry, dialogue, songs, and performance.


* Brief, consistent oral-reading progress checks.


Reader's Theater is especially useful because students have a reason to reread: they want to understand their roles and communicate the story to an audience.


Teachers also learn to monitor accuracy and comprehension alongside words correct per minute. Fluency measures are useful, but they should never become the sole definition of a successful reader.


**Workshop product:** A five-day fluency sequence using engaging texts, structured rereading, and simple progress-monitoring tools.


### Workshop 5: Vocabulary, Oral Language, and Comprehension


Children cannot fully understand what they read if they do not understand the words, concepts, and relationships within the text.


Comprehension begins long before a student opens a book. It develops through conversation, listening, background knowledge, vocabulary, curiosity, and experiences that give language meaning.


Teachers explore practical ways to build these foundations:


* Interactive read-alouds.


* Explicit instruction in high-value vocabulary.


* Student-friendly definitions and examples.


* Discussion before, during, and after reading.


* Story retelling and sequencing.


* Drawing and diagramming ideas.


* Asking questions that require inference and evidence.


* Connecting literature with science, history, art, cooking, and hands-on projects.


A classroom studying habitats, for example, might build a small model ecosystem, discuss the relationship between organisms, learn essential vocabulary, and then read an appropriately challenging passage about food webs.


The hands-on activity does not replace reading instruction. It gives students knowledge and language that can make the reading more meaningful.


**Workshop product:** A vocabulary-and-comprehension lesson built around a real book, a knowledge-rich topic, and purposeful discussion.


### Workshop 6: Close the Gap for Older Struggling Readers


Older struggling readers need instruction that respects their age, interests, intelligence, and dignity.


A sixth grader who struggles to decode should not automatically be given materials that feel designed for a first grader. The student may need foundational instruction, but that instruction can be delivered through age-respectful texts, meaningful topics, and achievable challenges.


Teachers learn to combine:


* Explicit instruction in multisyllabic decoding.


* Morphology: roots, prefixes, and suffixes.


* Purposeful fluency practice.


* Vocabulary and background knowledge.


* Comprehension instruction.


* Supported reading of challenging text.


* Access to grade-level ideas through read-alouds, discussion, and appropriate scaffolds.


The IES practice guide for grades 4–9 specifically recommends building multisyllabic decoding skills, purposeful fluency, and comprehension while providing opportunities to engage with challenging text.


Teachers should not confuse a student's reading level with the limits of that student's thinking.


**Workshop product:** An intervention sequence that addresses foundational reading needs while maintaining access to intellectually engaging material.


### Workshop 7: Dyslexia, Individual Differences, and the Child Behind the Data


Reading difficulty is not a character flaw, a lack of intelligence, or proof that a child has not tried hard enough.


Dyslexia can make accurate or fluent word reading and spelling difficult. Students differ in their learning profiles, and some need more explicit, systematic, cumulative instruction and additional opportunities to practice.


In this workshop, teachers learn to:


* Recognize warning signs that warrant closer assessment.


* Avoid treating a screening result as a diagnosis.


* Use explicit, systematic instruction matched to demonstrated needs.


* Provide appropriate accommodations and assistive technology when helpful.


* Coordinate with families, special educators, and other specialists.


* Preserve student dignity and avoid public comparisons.


* Track progress and adjust instruction when growth is insufficient.


Teachers also examine the emotional consequences of repeated reading failure: avoidance, anxiety, embarrassment, and the belief that school is a place where one is continually reminded of what one cannot do.


As a teacher with personal experience of dyslexia and dysgraphia, I know that a child's difficulties with print do not tell the whole story of that child's abilities.


We must teach the skill without diminishing the person.


**Workshop product:** A strengths-based student support plan with instructional priorities, accommodations where appropriate, and a process for reviewing progress.


### Workshop 8: Build a Joy Engine for Reading


Children need structured opportunities to practice reading, but they also need reasons to want to read.


The Joy Engine workshop combines explicit instruction with meaningful, cooperative, creative learning.


Teachers explore:


* Brain breaks that help students reset attention.


* Songs and rhythmic language activities.


* Reader's Theater and dramatic storytelling.


* Board games and word games.


* Cooperative learning structures.


* Art, drawing, construction, and storytelling.


* Real books, read-alouds, and classroom libraries.


* Student choice within appropriate instructional goals.


* Projects that connect reading with science, history, and the arts.


A reading lesson might begin with a short phonics mini-lesson, move into a cooperative word-building challenge, continue with supported reading, and conclude with a dramatic retelling or discussion.


Joy is not a substitute for instruction. It is a way to create engagement, belonging, and meaningful reasons to participate in instruction.


**Workshop product:** A weekly reading schedule that integrates foundational skills, connected text, discussion, movement, creativity, and student choice.


## The Reading Sage 20-Day Reading Gap Sprint


A workshop should lead to classroom action. Teachers need time to apply their learning, examine student progress, and adjust their teaching.


The Reading Sage Reading Boot Camp approach can be adapted into a 20-day instructional sprint. This is a proposed implementation framework, not a guarantee that every reading gap will close in 20 days.


### Days 1–5: Identify and Teach


* Establish a baseline using appropriate screening and diagnostic measures.


* Identify one or two high-priority instructional targets for each student.


* Deliver explicit lessons with modeling, guided practice, and corrective feedback.


* Include connected reading every day.


* Record student responses and recurring errors.


### Days 6–10: Practice and Reinforce


* Continue systematic instruction.


* Add word-building, sound games, and targeted fluency practice.


* Use short, meaningful texts connected to the skills being taught.


* Check whether students can apply their learning to unfamiliar words and passages.


* Collaborate with colleagues about students who need additional support.


### Days 11–15: Transfer the Skills


* Practice the target skills in connected text.


* Build vocabulary and background knowledge.


* Include oral retelling, discussion, and comprehension checks.


* Adjust the lesson when students repeat the same errors.


* Increase scaffolding or provide additional guided practice where necessary.


### Days 16–20: Review and Plan Next Steps


* Repeat appropriate measures under comparable conditions.


* Compare student performance with baseline data.


* Identify skills that are improving and those that remain difficult.


* Review instructional dosage, attendance, lesson quality, and opportunities to practice.


* Plan the next instructional cycle.


Twenty days can provide useful information about response to instruction. It is not a universal timeline for closing substantial reading gaps. Some students will make rapid progress; others will require sustained intervention, more intensive assessment, or a different instructional approach.


### A practical daily schedule


A school can adapt this framework to its staffing, student needs, and existing schedule. One possible 90-minute instructional block is:


| Time       | Instruction                                             |

| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------- |

| 10 minutes | Oral language, sound awareness, or a targeted warm-up   |

| 15 minutes | Explicit phonics or word-analysis lesson                |

| 20 minutes | Guided decoding, spelling, and word-building practice   |

| 20 minutes | Supported reading and fluency practice                  |

| 15 minutes | Vocabulary, comprehension, and discussion               |

| 10 minutes | Review, brief assessment, and a joyful closing activity |


This is an illustrative schedule, not a fixed prescription. Teachers should adapt time and content to the students' ages, instructional needs, and demonstrated progress. Students may also need additional time for oral language, knowledge building, writing, or more intensive foundational instruction.


## How to Make Teacher Workshops Worth the Time


Professional development works best when teachers have opportunities to learn, rehearse, implement, and reflect—not simply listen to a presentation.


A useful workshop structure includes four parts:


**1. Learn.** Introduce a research-informed practice and explain why it may help.


**2. Practice.** Have teachers demonstrate the routine with colleagues, using sample words, texts, and student responses.


**3. Apply.** Ask teachers to plan a lesson for an actual instructional need in their classrooms.


**4. Reflect.** Bring teachers together to review student work and progress data, discuss what happened, and decide what to change.


Administrators can support the process by protecting collaboration time, providing appropriate materials, helping teachers access diagnostic expertise, and avoiding the assumption that buying a program is equivalent to improving instruction.


A school can use published evidence-based guidance without requiring every teacher to teach every child in precisely the same way. Consistency in instructional goals and quality matters; so does professional judgment about how to respond to individual students.


## Measuring Success: Look Beyond a Single Score


Reading progress should be measured through multiple forms of evidence.


Depending on the student's needs, teachers may examine:


* Phonemic-awareness performance.


* Letter-sound knowledge and decoding accuracy.


* Spelling and word analysis.


* Accuracy and fluency in connected text.


* Vocabulary development.


* Oral and written comprehension.


* Transfer of skills to unfamiliar words and passages.


* Student engagement, confidence, and willingness to read.


Universal screening helps identify students who may be at risk. Diagnostic assessment helps clarify the nature of a difficulty. Progress monitoring helps determine whether instruction is working.


When a student is not making adequate progress, the response should not be to wait indefinitely or repeat the same lesson unchanged. The team should review the evidence, instructional match, intensity, attendance, opportunities to practice, and need for additional evaluation or support.


The purpose of assessment is to inform teaching—not to turn children into permanent labels.


## Final Thoughts: Fix the Reading Gap Without Losing the Child


We can teach phonics without eliminating play. We can use data without allowing data to define a child. We can provide structured intervention without abandoning literature, music, art, discussion, and curiosity.


The strongest reading instruction combines explicit teaching with meaningful practice, skilled observation, responsive adjustments, and access to rich language and ideas.


For Reading Sage, the central message is simple:


**Find the instructional need. Teach it explicitly. Practice it meaningfully. Monitor progress. Adjust the instruction. Protect the child's joy in learning.**


Teachers deserve professional development that strengthens their ability to do this work. Students deserve classrooms where reading difficulties are treated as problems to solve—not reasons to lower expectations for a child's future.


The reading gap is a serious challenge. It is also a call to action for every school that wants all children to become capable, confident, and enthusiastic readers.


---


## Suggested Resources for Teachers


1. [IES What Works Clearinghouse: Foundational Reading Skills, K–3](https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/PracticeGuide/21/)


2. [IES What Works Clearinghouse: Reading Interventions, Grades 4–9](https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/PracticeGuide/29)


3. [Institute of Education Sciences: A Practitioner’s Guide to Improving Literacy Outcomes](https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/supporting-recovery-with-evidence-based-practices/a-practitioners-guide-to-improving-litercy-outcomes-for-students)


4. [National Reading Panel resources from the National Institutes of Health](https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/org/der/branches/cdbb/nationalreadingpanelpubs)


*Reading Sage | Sean Taylor, M.Ed. | Reading Boot Camp*


*Instructional deficits, not academic deficits. Teach the child, not just the curriculum.*


## Companion video explainer: “How to Fix Reading Gaps — 8 Teacher Workshops That Work”


![Expanded reading program closing literacy gaps in Charleston County classrooms](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/hHxSqsiXKhb1rXAK0Y9vZkvThv0X65TuP3SaDKExuuFiKc4V8-kxmOkzV_Cp2N9kxtzNQLoIPOR97FPaL5NGb12uPsjRIZ8IK6bdwS0zwzoW6sUr1A3G1P0hOH9Fe_PxJT_OWwNXodDOXRaqe8jF66HAlzC81oKxNBqCI8a-p-Q?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


## Video concept


Format: narrated explainer · Suggested length: 6–8 minutes · Audience: teachers, reading specialists, principals, and homeschool educators


### Suggested narration and storyboard


![Acadience Reading Middle-of-Year Benchmark | Buffalo Point Elementary](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/e0HgEzrIAVbZSDZWn3NqCp5w9R32nArzVfBg_HuPrACieIukewzaPPerdMAMs0W_K2FRM646mBEzOovC3QpvJJuZ5zEeW8VLsWZxH5qOnL3wVQo_lSX5JfCUkaGYyzASjeNj8vbUUqmbbsWrpZVsCT8v7ydyktG0WF3a5y-lRL8?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 1 — The reading gap (0:00–0:45)


Narration: “What happens when a sixth grader has spent years in school but still struggles to read independently? The answer isn't automatically another workbook, another test, or another software subscription. First, we need to understand what the child needs to learn.”


On-screen text: Identify the gap. Teach the skill. Monitor progress.


![Jolly Phonics Guide 2026: 42 Sounds, 7 Groups, 5 Skills](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/09D571d2WaFyjZXMwMWzt0HiAFZlI2_6Lsj9WvH9zTpwpScr7a1pJ1f1-XcRHtxzBOJBssREs5YQbnO-k82XotlzJLSxsze-RKPSD11SseFIzcPAMCK1-z4vztaSf9IqSN_oZZ9z3UfRzAHWDiAth6xf-4OYRgWV3Ep1LKABIHY?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 2 — Diagnose before intervening (0:45–1:30)


Narration: “Reading difficulties have different causes and patterns. Some students need phonemic-awareness instruction. Others need systematic phonics, multisyllabic decoding, fluency practice, vocabulary, or comprehension support. Good teachers learn to recognize the difference.”


Visual: An animated reading diagnostic map branching into sounds, decoding, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.


![Daycare vs. Montessori vs. Nanny: Understanding Your Childcare Options](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/-FTMgyAKraJn3cSVdmr9_a4V4Hhz-iDvwXmpNrHy7St62T5uXAQH2rIEarENjBLBQobE8-WcwNRFNqFBKVUMf-lD_4oSaTsPm5_EaeqiEvXUu9HxoJAbWcYUeE8SroIHOImPamxshaoXpgyCDOg--OwS-AZ4TCofJe6NfsTrbaA?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 3 — Teach foundational skills (1:30–2:30)


Narration: “Make sounds visible. Build words with letters. Compare spelling patterns. Model decoding. Provide guided practice and feedback. Then help students use their new skills in connected text.”


Visual: Animate the words map → mop → shop → chop, highlighting the changing letters.


![Declaration of Independence & Constitution Reader's Theater Bundle 4th & 5th](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/jh4lu_2UdzEa3sLNhPAvu9jxZfGG8weZpk41W2JnYIDmOR7pLx3qdGgKJKVTMpHlG94ErnNSu3FBvuTOe3MKKycnaMfehWePrLTfqryG_akZPnz02NeQ0HLlWKiTQNI8dappPzkUpl-vADeNtDXIbEKwmOBxUXz58eXoer7iJYU?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 4 — Make fluency and comprehension meaningful (2:30–3:30)


Narration: “Fluency isn't a race. Students need accuracy, phrasing, expression, and understanding. Choral reading, partner reading, Reader's Theater, rich read-alouds, and purposeful discussion give students reasons to reread and opportunities to understand.”


Visual: A simple passage changes from word-by-word reading into expressive phrasing; key vocabulary appears beside an illustration.


![Transform Literacy Outcomes](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/DZI2-yv13B6nkOKDdFDpsX7zfBbvUYlZKRDLUt_TJWF-p9bNND6aUkblHQgq_TMuf-eKqt353PPYQ62744WmrHOMPl-JJsrS3ioF8px2dm8MwttoEqGSDaOfuN0sbbnb0LZppT8UJsHFhtmDPCPTBTKc87DaWiwxIjPlG743hG4?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 5 — Train teachers, not just systems (3:30–4:30)


Narration: “Effective professional development isn't passive. Teachers learn a technique, practice it, plan a lesson, try it with students, and return to examine the results. Training should strengthen teacher expertise and instructional decision-making.”


Visual: Four connected steps: Learn → Practice → Apply → Reflect.


![Indoor Winter Activities for Kids That Don’t Involve Screens](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/nHReNalcz2vkxcuYyzhtFRdAA2DYcDOkKrwgH3IG1j1GnHWT2Vz22lSRHp6pt5LiFJht6DBIt0NO6r-mzd-ZCEEBT_Hszb0-Wd20q6cn4D_VI7b2hm00Tp0dM4luh-2UhfhoKmyJVUy_GhO2-EoxanLnJhxJMPF6ivEKyfZs89I?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 6 — The 20-day instructional sprint (4:30–5:30)


Narration: “Use a short instructional cycle to establish a baseline, teach targeted skills, practice and reinforce, and review progress. Twenty days is a checkpoint, not a promise. If a student isn't progressing, adjust the instruction and provide the support they need.”


Visual: A four-stage timeline with a baseline and progress checks.


![Whole Language vs Phonics: Which Reading Method Works Best?](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/-JN2AmioQh-2kLbVRStMUCpshWNnj5MvvIexWkyBxKndF9_hYwG_5t8K4w-vMw7tj2iBEhaXaggWtRZdpqw78Od7hy3Op7wLEuy90ER1ueclSIChpdRPHpAgP4SNZxtWLVc-PO4F7JLcaCnbmIAYn_b2z1DjDW9oHA141x7lNNo?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 7 — The Joy Engine (5:30–6:30)


Narration: “We can teach reading systematically without stripping away curiosity, creativity, music, art, or the joy of discovering a good book. A child is more than a reading score. Our responsibility is to teach the skill while protecting the learner's dignity.”


Visual: A book opens into scenes of reading, music, hands-on activities, and collaborative learning.


![Soundwell Phonics](https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/ZZpKkdf3hK0hf9wNrVVdw_nzprXP8l5F94SgByGPdp2cKSGw6nDd0YGxlaB_cxzyfHw5Uql50GXeYiEzuB40iNsZbpFgRWoL527MrjlGshB9Ost-1cVJfdmi3DhlAC6FYpnO4JWNy4SVuD4KoStJ-CLIuYqU7HUxu3Id9LRvIF0?purpose=inline)


Add to Favorites


Scene 8 — Closing call to action (6:30–7:00)


Narration: “Find the instructional need. Teach it explicitly. Practice it meaningfully. Monitor progress. Adjust the instruction. And never lose sight of the child behind the data. This is Sean Taylor with Reading Sage. Let's close reading gaps—one learner, one skill, one joyful lesson at a time.”


On-screen text: Reading Sage — Instructional deficits, not academic deficits.


## Make the video work harder for Reading Sage


* Thumbnail: “CLOSE THE READING GAP” in large, high-contrast lettering, with a teacher helping a student build words using letter tiles.


* YouTube title: How to Fix Reading Gaps: 8 Teacher Workshop Ideas | Reading Sage


* Description: Introduce the eight workshops, the 20-day instructional sprint, the importance of diagnostic teaching, and the balance between evidence-based instruction and joyful learning.


* Companion download: A printable teacher workshop planner with diagnostic prompts, station activities, a 20-day progress tracker, and lesson-reflection questions.


* Blog call to action: Invite schools, reading specialists, and homeschool educators to adapt the workshop series to their learners and share which instructional routines are working.


The most important distinction to preserve throughout the article and video is that these are research-informed workshop ideas, not a claim that the entire eight-workshop package has been experimentally validated. The underlying instructional recommendations are supported by published reading guidance; the combined Reading Sage workshop sequence is a proposed professional-development framework.


Finnish Education Through the Eyes of Maria Montessori

 Learning From Finland Through the Eyes of Maria Montessori

What Finnish Education Reveals About the Child, the Teacher, and the Purpose of School





















This podcast examines the philosophical and practical intersections between *Maria Montessori's child development pedagogy* and **Finland's national public education system**. It highlights how both educational frameworks reject rigid, standardized teaching in favor of **trusting educators, honoring individual student needs, and promoting active learning**. While Montessori offers a structured classroom methodology, Finland demonstrates how an entire nation can successfully institutionalize child-centered principles on a systemic level. Ultimately, the comparison bridges traditional developmental theories with modern public schooling, suggesting that the most effective educational models combine **student agency, play, and professional teacher autonomy**.

By Sean Taylor, M.Ed. — Reading Sage

“The child is both a hope and a promise for mankind.”
— Maria Montessori

What would Maria Montessori see if she walked into a Finnish school today?

She would recognize some things immediately.

She would see children learning through activity rather than simply sitting and receiving information. She would see teachers who are expected to understand children rather than merely deliver a scripted curriculum. She would see play, creativity, crafts, music, movement, cooperation and exploration treated as legitimate parts of education.

She would probably recognize something even more fundamental:

Finland has built an education system that, in many respects, takes the child seriously.

That does not mean Finnish education is Montessori.

It isn't.

Montessori created a distinct pedagogy, with carefully prepared environments, developmental sequences, specialized materials, mixed-age classrooms, uninterrupted work periods and a particular conception of the teacher's role.

Finland created something different: a national public education system built around equity, professional teachers, student participation, broad learning, well-being and local autonomy.

But there is an extraordinary philosophical overlap.

And when we look at Finnish education through Montessori's eyes, an important question emerges:

What happens when a school system is designed around the development of the child rather than the convenience of the institution?


Montessori's Radical Idea: Follow the Child

Maria Montessori's most famous principle is often reduced to three words:

Follow the child.

But "follow the child" does not mean:

Let children do whatever they want.

Montessori was not advocating educational anarchy.

She was advocating observation.

The teacher observes the child closely.

What does the child already know?

What is the child attempting to understand?

Where is the child struggling?

What captures the child's attention?

What is the child's next developmental need?

What environment will allow the child to become more independent?

The adult then prepares an environment in which the child can act, explore, practice, make mistakes, correct those mistakes and gradually become more independent.

That is a radically different starting point from:

Here is the curriculum.
Here is the pacing guide.
Here is the worksheet.
Here is the test.
Now make every child move through it at the same speed.

Montessori's question was essentially:

What does this particular child need next?

That question is remarkably compatible with the philosophy behind Finnish education.


Finland: A National System That Takes the Learner Seriously

Finland does not operate Montessori schools on a national scale.

Finnish schools have a national core curriculum, academic subjects, assessment requirements and clear educational objectives.

But the Finnish system also gives considerable responsibility to teachers, schools and municipalities.

Finnish curriculum guidance emphasizes students' experiences, interests, participation, interaction and active involvement in learning.

Students are not simply recipients of knowledge.

They are participants in the learning process.

This creates an important distinction.

Traditional industrial schooling asks:

How do we get children through the curriculum?

Montessori asks:

What does this child need to develop next?

Finnish education often asks:

How can we create the conditions in which this child can learn, participate and develop?

Those questions aren't identical.

But they live in the same philosophical neighborhood.


The Prepared Environment

One of Montessori's greatest contributions was the concept of the prepared environment.

The classroom is not merely a room where instruction happens.

The environment itself teaches.

Furniture matters.

Materials matter.

Organization matters.

Beauty matters.

Accessibility matters.

Order matters.

The child's ability to move independently matters.

The environment communicates:

You belong here. You are capable. You can do things yourself.

This idea has a powerful parallel in Finnish education.

Finnish schools have historically placed considerable emphasis on creating environments in which children can:

  • move
  • explore
  • collaborate
  • experiment
  • create
  • play
  • investigate
  • communicate
  • work independently.

The classroom isn't supposed to function like a factory floor.

And this is one of the most important lessons for American education.

The physical environment is part of pedagogy.

If every chair faces a screen, every assignment comes from a computer, every activity has one correct answer, and every minute is controlled by an adult, the environment is teaching children something.

It is teaching them:

Wait for instructions.

A Montessori environment teaches:

Look. Choose. Try. Think. Do. Correct. Continue.

A well-designed Finnish learning environment often communicates something similar:

Participate. Explore. Cooperate. Take responsibility.


The Teacher Is Not the Curriculum

This may be the most important connection between Montessori and Finland.

In both philosophies, the teacher is more than a delivery mechanism for someone else's curriculum.

The teacher is a professional.

A professional observes.

A professional interprets.

A professional adapts.

A professional decides when to intervene and when to step back.

That requires something increasingly rare in highly standardized education:

Teacher agency.

If we don't trust teachers to make professional decisions, we eventually reduce teaching to implementation.

The teacher becomes the person who operates:

  • the reading program
  • the computer program
  • the workbook
  • the pacing guide
  • the assessment platform
  • the intervention protocol.

The teacher becomes a curriculum operator.

Montessori envisioned something very different.

And Finland's educational culture has historically placed substantial trust in the professional preparation and judgment of teachers.

The underlying philosophy is remarkably simple:

If you want excellent education, you need excellent teachers—and you need to let them teach.


Freedom Within Structure

This is where both Montessori and Finland are frequently misunderstood.

Child-centered education does not mean:

No expectations.

It does not mean:

No curriculum.

It does not mean:

Children never have to do anything difficult.

Montessori classrooms are highly structured.

The materials are sequenced.

Lessons are carefully designed.

The environment has rules.

Children learn grace and courtesy.

Children learn to care for materials.

Children learn to complete work.

Children learn independence.

Freedom exists inside a carefully constructed environment.

Finland similarly combines student participation with national educational expectations.

There is structure.

There are subjects.

There are learning objectives.

There is assessment.

But structure doesn't have to become domination.

That distinction matters.

Structure says:

Here is a framework in which you can succeed.

Domination says:

Here is exactly what you will do, exactly how you will do it, and exactly when you will do it.

Children need structure.

They do not need to be micromanaged.


Montessori, Finland and the Problem With "One Size Fits All"

A classroom contains human beings.

That means it contains enormous variation.

One child may be reading Harry Potter.

Another may still be struggling to distinguish b from d.

One child may understand multiplication conceptually but struggle with handwriting.

Another may write beautifully but have difficulty with oral language.

One child may need movement.

Another may need quiet.

One child may learn through music.

Another through drawing.

Another through building.

Another through conversation.

Another through repeated practice.

This is precisely why the phrase "grade level" can become educationally dangerous when we confuse a statistical category with an individual child.

Montessori's answer was individual progression within a prepared environment.

Finland's answer includes differentiation, student support and flexible approaches to learning.

The common principle is:

The child is not defective because the child doesn't fit the timetable.

Sometimes the timetable is the problem.


The Finnish Respect for Childhood

Perhaps the biggest philosophical connection is Finland's willingness to protect childhood.

Early childhood education in Finland places significant emphasis on:

  • play
  • relationships
  • interaction
  • exploration
  • participation
  • creativity
  • physical activity
  • emotional development
  • language
  • social development.

That sounds remarkably close to what many American parents instinctively want when they say:

"I just want my child to enjoy learning."

And that brings us to one of Montessori's most important insights:

Joy is not the opposite of rigor.

Joy can be the mechanism through which rigor becomes possible.

A child who is fascinated by insects may voluntarily spend an hour reading about beetles.

A child who loves building may practice mathematics because mathematics helps build something.

A child who loves stories may tolerate the difficult work of decoding because there is something on the other side of the decoding:

meaning.

The goal isn't to make school easy.

The goal is to make learning worth the effort.


Where Finland and Montessori Diverge

We shouldn't romanticize the comparison.

Finland is not Montessori.

There are significant differences.

Montessori is a specific pedagogy.

Montessori includes a distinctive developmental philosophy and specialized materials.

Finnish education is a national system.

It includes conventional academic subjects and national educational objectives.


Montessori emphasizes individualized sequences.

A Montessori child can progress through many activities according to readiness.

Finnish students are still part of an age-organized public-school system with common curriculum expectations.


Montessori emphasizes the prepared environment.

Finnish schools may use many different pedagogical approaches.

A Finnish classroom does not automatically become Montessori simply because it has student-centered learning.


Montessori emphasizes concentrated independent work.

Finnish education places substantial emphasis on collaboration, participation and multidisciplinary learning.


Montessori has a very distinctive conception of materials.

Finland does not depend on Montessori materials.

A Finnish teacher might use:

  • books
  • experiments
  • discussion
  • technology
  • art
  • crafts
  • outdoor learning
  • projects
  • games
  • traditional instruction.

The Finnish system is eclectic in ways that Montessori is not.


Finland May Actually Be Montessori + Reggio + Something Else

This is where the comparison gets particularly interesting.

If we place Montessori and Reggio Emilia beside Finnish education, we begin to see a fascinating three-way conversation.

Montessori says:

Follow the child.

Observe the child.

Prepare the environment.

Build independence.

Move from concrete experience toward abstraction.

Protect concentration.


Reggio Emilia says:

Listen to the child.

Children have many "languages."

The environment is a teacher.

Projects emerge from children's questions.

Art, construction, movement, language and exploration are legitimate forms of thinking.


Finland says:

Trust the child and the teacher.

Protect childhood.

Promote participation.

Develop the whole person.

Allow teachers professional autonomy.

Connect learning to life.

Use collaboration and multidisciplinary learning.


Put those three ideas together and something remarkable emerges:

The Child as a Human Being—Not a Data Point

This may be the deepest lesson.

A child is not:

  • a test score
  • a reading level
  • a percentile
  • a growth metric
  • an intervention tier
  • a computer-generated recommendation
  • a standardized data point.

Those measurements can provide information.

But they cannot describe the whole child.

The child is also:

  • curious
  • funny
  • frightened
  • creative
  • social
  • musical
  • physical
  • imaginative
  • stubborn
  • compassionate
  • inventive
  • exhausted
  • hopeful.

And education has to address the whole human being.


This Is Where the "Joy Engine" Comes In

My own educational philosophy, The Joy Engine, sits in this intersection.

I don't want to reproduce Montessori.

I don't want to reproduce Finland.

I don't want to reproduce Reggio Emilia.

I want to ask:

What can we learn from each of them?

From Montessori:

Follow the child.

From Reggio Emilia:

Listen to the child.

From Finland:

Trust the teacher.

From structured literacy:

Teach children the code of written language explicitly and systematically.

From experiential education:

Let children do things.

From the arts:

Give children multiple languages for thinking.

From play:

Make room for curiosity and imagination.

From great teachers:

Know your children.

And from 26 years of teaching reading:

Don't confuse instructional deficits with academic deficits.

A child who cannot yet read is not necessarily a child who cannot learn.

A child who struggles with decoding is not a broken child.

A child who needs movement isn't necessarily an undisciplined child.

A child who needs repetition isn't necessarily lazy.

A child who needs a different pathway isn't necessarily behind.

Sometimes the child needs better instruction.

Sometimes the child needs more time.

Sometimes the child needs different materials.

Sometimes the child needs less pressure.

Sometimes the child needs more joy.

And sometimes the teacher simply needs permission to teach the child who is actually sitting in front of them.


The Big Question for American Education

Perhaps the wrong question is:

"How can America copy Finland?"

We can't.

Education systems grow out of different histories, cultures, laws, communities and expectations.

The better question is:

"What does Finland remind us that we already know about children?"

Children need:

belonging.

movement.

play.

music.

art.

conversation.

stories.

hands-on experiences.

challenge.

rest.

relationships.

competent teachers.

time.

meaning.

and opportunities to become increasingly independent.

Montessori understood this more than a century ago.

Finland demonstrates how some of those principles can be embedded within a modern public education system.


The Montessori Question

If Maria Montessori walked into a Finnish classroom, she might not say:

"This is Montessori."

She might ask something more interesting:

"What are you learning about this child?"

Because that is the essential shift.

The child is not merely the recipient of education.

The child is the reason education exists.

And that leads us back to the fundamental Montessori principle:

Follow the child.

Not because the curriculum doesn't matter.

Not because academic knowledge doesn't matter.

Not because children should never be challenged.

But because the curriculum exists for the child—not the child for the curriculum.

That distinction may be one of the most important lessons Finland can offer American education.

And it may also be one of the most important lessons Maria Montessori still has to teach us.


Reading Sage Takeaway

Follow the Child. Trust the Teacher. Prepare the Environment. Protect Childhood. Teach With Joy.

That isn't a Finnish education system.

It isn't Montessori.

It isn't Reggio Emilia.

It is a philosophy of education that begins with a very old-fashioned idea:

Children are human beings before they are students.

And perhaps that is where educational reform should begin.

Not with another curriculum.

Not with another computer program.

Not with another workbook.

Not with another standardized test.

But with an adult sitting beside a child and asking:

"Who are you, what are you curious about, what can you already do, and what should we help you discover next?"

That is where Montessori began.

It is one of the places where Finland has much to teach us.

And it is where the Joy Engine begins.

Combining Montessori, Reggio Emilia, and Finland into a unified educational framework brings together three distinct but complementary perspectives: a classroom methodology (Montessori), a relational inquiry approach (Reggio Emilia), and a national public system (Finland)[1].

When synthesized—as seen in frameworks like Sean Taylor's Joy Engine—each tradition supplies a core pillar of the overarching structure[4][5]:


1. The Core Triad: Three Fundamental Commitments

A unified framework rests on three foundational principles[3]:

  • Follow the Child (Montessori): Focuses on individual developmental readiness, self-directed progression, and executive functioning through concrete-to-abstract learning sequences[3].
  • Listen to the Child (Reggio Emilia): Views children as capable co-constructors of knowledge with "a hundred languages" for thinking and expression, using their questions as the fuel for emergent inquiry[3].
  • Trust the Teacher & Protect Childhood (Finland): Establishes high professional teacher autonomy, protects play and well-being, and ensures educational equity within a flexible public framework[2].

2. The Learning Environment & Structure

  • The Prepared Environment as the "Third Teacher": Merges Montessori’s self-correcting, ordered, and accessible materials with Reggio Emilia’s creative ateliers/aesthetic spaces and Finland’s flexible, movement-friendly learning environments[3]. The physical space communicates independence, capability, and belonging[16][17].
  • Freedom Within Structure: Rather than educational anarchy or rigid factory-model pacing, the framework provides clear behavioral and learning expectations while granting children autonomy in choice, pacing, and movement[8].

3. Tri-Partite Learning Pathways

The daily framework balances three distinct modes of learning[1]:

  1. Individual Skill Mastery (Montessori): Uninterrupted work cycles where children engage with sequenced, hands-on materials to build foundational reading, math, and practical life skills at their own pace[8].
  2. Collaborative Emergent Inquiry (Reggio Emilia + Finland): Small-group and multidisciplinary project modules triggered by children’s real-world questions, fostering social interaction, problem-solving, and community participation[1].
  3. Purposeful Play & Whole-Child Well-Being (Finland): Recognizing unstructured and guided play as an essential medium for learning, joyful engagement, and emotional development alongside arts, crafts, and physical movement[14].

4. The Role of the Educator and System Architecture

  • The Educator as Professional Observer: Replaces the scripted "curriculum operator" with an autonomous professional who carefully observes children, prepares the environment, and decides when to guide, intervene, or step back[13].
  • Systemic Transformation: Shifts both the relationship between teacher and child (Montessori/Reggio) and between teacher and system (Finland), replacing standardized data points with a holistic commitment to human development[2].

In short, Montessori provides the developmental architecture, Reggio Emilia provides the creative and relational inquiry, and Finland provides the systemic culture of trust, equity, and well-being