THE READING REVIVAL/REVOLUTION
10 Out-of-the-Box Ideas to Pull Students Back into Deep Reading
From Cognitive Game Books to Solo
RPG Zines to AI-Powered Literary Transmissions
The numbers are not subtle.
According to federal data from the National Endowment for the Arts, the share
of 13-year-olds reading for fun almost every day has collapsed — from 27% in
2012 to just 14% in 2023. Only 37.6% of adults reported reading a novel in
2022, the lowest figure in the survey's 30-year history. A comprehensive
longitudinal study tracking over 236,000 participants found that daily reading
for pleasure has declined at a statistically significant rate of approximately
3% per year across the past two decades.
Neuroscience adds a harder edge to
these statistics. Research from Johns Hopkins found that brain connectivity
patterns associated with deep reading comprehension are measurably weaker in
children with higher screen time — the regions responsible for language, visual
processing, and cognitive control simply communicate less with each other.
Reading specialist Maryanne Wolf calls the result 'skim to inform' cognition: a
mode optimized for rapid scanning that works against the sustained attention,
inference-making, and perspective-taking that literature uniquely develops.
And yet — something interesting is
happening on TikTok.
The #BookTok hashtag has
accumulated over 200 billion views. The platform has driven dramatic increases
in sales of both new and decades-old titles. A 2024 student survey found that
68% of BookTok users reported being encouraged to read a book they would not
have picked up otherwise. School librarians in multiple districts have reported
meaningful upticks in circulation. One 14-year-old, interviewed by a student
journalist, put it plainly: 'BookTok has made being a reader cool again.'
What BookTok discovered — and what
smart educators can build on — is that teenagers are not anti-book. They are
anti-isolation. Reading collapsed when it became a solitary, assessed,
compulsory act. It revives when it becomes social, physical, identity-forming,
and chosen. The ten ideas in this document are designed around that insight.
The
Numbers
|
14% 13-yr-olds reading daily for fun (2023) |
−13pts Drop from 2012 figure of 27% |
68% BookTok users who read new books
because of it |
37.6% Adults who read a novel in 2022 (30-yr
low) |
The Principle
Behind All 10 Ideas
Every idea in this document shares
a common architecture. It converts reading from a passive, assessed, solitary
act into an active, creative, social one. It gives students authorship — not
just of their interpretations, but of the actual worlds and stories they
inhabit. And it uses AI not as a replacement for imagination, but as a
cognitive scaffold that helps students build richer worlds, sharper arguments,
and more precise language than they could reach alone.
The goal is not to trick students
into reading. It is to build conditions under which the deep cognitive rewards
of reading — the perspective-taking, the sustained attention, the encounter
with complex human situations — become personally felt. When a student plays a
scenario they wrote and a peer encounters a moral dilemma they designed,
vocabulary and narrative structure are no longer academic abstractions. They
are the tools of world-making.
AI enters this picture as what it
genuinely is: a tireless co-designer, developmental editor, and research
partner. It does not replace the student's imagination — it scaffolds it. The
student remains the author. The student remains the player. The student remains
the mind that the game runs inside.
The 10 Ideas
|
01 COGNITIVE GAME BOOKS (COGS) Solo survival mind-adventures with no screen required |
|
Modeled
directly on the After the Flash prototype in this packet, COGs are immersive
single-player narrative experiences where the reader's imagination is the
game engine. No dice. No app. Just choices, consequences, and a mental stat
tracker on paper. Students
read a richly written scenario — post-collapse survival, deep-space
isolation, a city under magical siege — reach a GO instruction, close their
eyes, and run the scene entirely inside their minds. Then they record what
happened and live with the consequences. The physical act of tracking stats
on paper creates tactile investment that a screen cannot replicate. HOW TO
USE IT: Start
with a 10-scenario arc like After the Flash. Assign a COG as a semester-long
companion text — one scenario per week. Pair with journaling: students write
one paragraph describing their character's mental state after each session.
Build toward a class swap where students read each other's completed Field
Records and discuss divergent outcomes. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI to generate branching scenario variations for paths they didn't take.
Prompt: 'Rewrite Scenario 4 as if my character had joined the Iron Covenant
instead of the Seeders. Keep the same tone and stat mechanics.' Now they are
co-authoring and doing literary analysis simultaneously. |
|
02 THE STUDENT-BUILT GAMEBOOK SERIES Turn every reader into a world architect |
|
The most
powerful version of a COG isn't one students read — it's one they build.
Students design their own survival worlds, write scenario text in the
second-person voice, create branching decision trees, invent faction systems,
and assign resource mechanics. Then they swap books with peers and play each
other's creations. This
transforms the classroom into a game design studio, a creative writing
workshop, and a systems-thinking lab simultaneously. Students must think
deeply about pacing, consequence, and moral weight — because a peer is going
to experience every choice they designed. HOW TO
USE IT: Scaffold
the design process across six weeks: Week 1 worldbuilding, Week 2 character
creation, Weeks 3–4 scenario writing (3 scenarios minimum), Week 5 peer
playtesting, Week 6 revision and publication. 'Publish' means printing and
binding — a physical object the student made and another student read. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI as a developmental editor. They submit a scenario draft and prompt:
'What are the three weakest decision points in this scenario? Where does the
moral weight feel thin? Suggest one additional environmental variable that
would increase tension.' AI critiques their work; students revise. |
|
03 THE ONE-PAGE RPG ZINE A complete adventure in a single folded sheet |
|
The indie
TTRPG world has produced hundreds of complete, playable role-playing games
that fit on a single page. Many use minimal mechanics — one die, a deck of
cards, a coin — and generate entire adventures through imagination and
narrative prompting. These are literature dressed as games. A
student-designed one-page RPG zine includes: a premise (one paragraph), a
character with traits (choose 3 from a list), a conflict system (simple
enough to explain in 5 lines), and three scenario seeds. Printed, folded, and
traded, each zine is a piece of writing that gets read because someone wants
to play it. HOW TO
USE IT: Introduce
students to existing examples from itch.io's free solo RPG library — games
like Four Against Darkness and Alone Against the Frost. Analyze what makes
the writing compelling. Then students design their own one-page zine. Host a
Zine Fair: tables, printed copies, 15-minute playthroughs, peer review cards. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI to stress-test their mechanics. Prompt: 'I designed a one-page RPG
where players track Hope and Hunger. Here are my three scenario seeds.
Playtest each one and tell me where the mechanics break down or where the
narrative loses stakes.' AI becomes the first playtester. |
|
04 THE EPISTOLARY NOVEL-IN-A-NOTEBOOK Literature as physical artifact — handwritten, traded, and
continued |
|
Before
Instagram, before Twitter, there was the epistolary novel — a story told
through letters, diary entries, intercepted messages, and field notes.
Students create handwritten epistolary narratives in physical notebooks: a
character's journal during a crisis, a series of letters never sent, a ship's
log from a voyage into the unknown. The
physical notebook matters. Aging pages with tea, drawing maps in margins,
using different handwriting for different characters — these are acts of
embodied literacy that a screen makes impossible. When the notebook is passed
to a peer who continues the story, the reading is inseparable from the act of
writing. HOW TO
USE IT: Seed the
project with a dramatic inciting event: a pandemic, a ship that disappears, a
town that changes overnight. Each student begins a notebook from the
perspective of a different character. After three entries, notebooks rotate
to a new writer who continues the story from that character's voice. Final
notebooks become class anthologies. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI to research historical epistolary conventions — how a 1940s soldier
would write differently from a Victorian naturalist — then incorporate that
authenticity into their voice. AI becomes a research partner in service of
deeper, more grounded writing. |
|
05 THE CHOOSE YOUR OWN ENDING BOOK CLUB Social reading built around divergent choices |
|
Book
clubs fail when everyone reads the same thing and discusses it the same way.
This format flips that. The class reads a novel or short story up to a key
decision point — then stops. Each student writes their own ending, playing
out the logical consequences of the character's choice. Then everyone reads
both the actual ending and several peer endings. The
discussion that follows is electric, because students are no longer analyzing
what an author did — they are defending what they would have done, and
comparing outcomes. This is literary criticism disguised as creative play,
and it requires a depth of character understanding that no multiple-choice
quiz can assess. HOW TO
USE IT: Works
best with YA fiction that has a high-stakes turning point: The Maze Runner's
first escape attempt, The Giver's moment of departure, the arena choices in
The Hunger Games. Stop the class reading at the decision point. Give 48 hours
for individual endings. Compile into a class anthology before revealing the
author's choice. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: After
writing their own ending, students prompt AI: 'Here is the turning point in
this novel and my ending. What narrative logic am I using that the author
might have rejected? What consequences did I introduce that the original
novel was trying to avoid?' AI helps students articulate their own authorial
choices. |
|
06 VOCABULARY-FIRST WORLD BUILDING Academic language as the architecture of invented worlds |
|
The most
powerful vocabulary instruction happens when words carry emotional weight.
Instead of memorizing lists, students build fictional worlds governed by Tier
2 and Tier 3 academic vocabulary. The world's political system must use
governance, sovereignty, and jurisdiction correctly. Its ecology must grapple
with scarcity, contamination, and sustainability. Its history must include
collapse, resilience, and reconstruction. When a
student invents a faction called the Sovereignty Coalition and must explain
why it holds legitimate authority, they have understood the word sovereignty
in a way no flashcard delivers. The creative constraint of world-building
forces precise vocabulary use, because vague language creates a vague world —
and a vague world isn't playable. HOW TO
USE IT: Assign a
vocabulary set per unit: 10–15 Tier 2/3 words. Students must build a world
where each word names a real feature of that world — a place, a law, a
resource, a crisis. The world is then documented in a 2-page field guide.
Assessment: remove the vocabulary words and ask a peer to read the field
guide — can they identify where each word belongs? AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
submit their world draft and prompt AI: 'Here are 12 vocabulary words and my
world. Find every place where I used a simpler word where one of these
vocabulary words would be more precise. Show me the sentence, the simpler
word I used, and the better replacement.' AI becomes a precision editor. |
|
07 THE DUET ADVENTURE — TEACHER AND STUDENT CO-AUTHOR Adult mentorship as literary co-creation |
|
One of
the most underused formats in education is the duet: one teacher, one
student, building a story together in real time. The teacher plays the role
of narrator and world-responder; the student is the protagonist making
decisions. The teacher writes the next scene based on the student's choice;
the student writes their character's internal response. This
creates a private, sustained literary relationship between an adult
reader-writer and a young one. The teacher models complex sentence structure,
moral nuance, and narrative consequence. The student experiences a story
built specifically for them — one that responds to their choices, reflects
their interests, and challenges their thinking in personalized ways. HOW TO
USE IT: Run as a
6-week correspondence exercise: alternating written turns in a shared
physical notebook or Google Doc. The teacher sets the world and writes the
opening scenario. The student responds with a decision and their character's
inner monologue. The teacher advances the plot based on the choice. Minimum 3
exchanges per week. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Teachers
use AI to generate branching scenario options for the next exchange, then
choose and personalize the best one. Students use AI to improve their
character's inner monologue: 'Here is what I wrote. Make it sound more like a
17-year-old who is trying to be brave but is actually terrified. Add one
detail about their physical environment.' |
|
08 THE READING ARTIFACT COLLECTION Physical books as sensory objects worth collecting and
displaying |
|
BookTok's
most surprising discovery is that teenagers love physical books as objects —
the smell of paper, the feel of a worn spine, the aesthetic of a well-curated
shelf. This is a design opportunity. Students who feel no connection to the
school library often respond immediately to the idea of building a personal
collection of books that mean something to them. A Reading
Artifact Collection is a curated personal library of 5–10 books, each
annotated with a hand-written tag explaining why it belongs: where it was
found, what it changed, what question it raised. The collection is displayed,
photographed, and written about. The goal is not reading more books — it's
developing an identity as a person who has a relationship with specific
books. HOW TO
USE IT: Launch
with a class visit to a used bookstore with a $5 budget. Students find one
book that interests them based only on the cover, first paragraph, or table
of contents. That becomes Artifact #1. Over the semester, each student adds
to their collection and writes one 'acquisition note' per book — a paragraph
about why it entered the collection. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI to research the history of their chosen books: 'Tell me the cultural
context in which this book was first published. What was happening in the
world? Why might a reader in that time have found it important?' AI delivers
the kind of background that makes a book feel historically alive. |
|
09 THE FACTION DEBATE — LIVING LITERATURE Embodied argumentation drawn from the books students have read |
|
The most
engaging debates students have ever heard are the ones where they have to
argue a position they built themselves inside a fictional world they care
about. After reading any dystopian or survival narrative — or after playing a
COG — students align with one of the story's factions and must argue for that
faction's worldview using only evidence from the text. This is
literary analysis as performance. A student representing the Iron Covenant
must argue that security requires hierarchy — using specific textual moments
and logical consequences. A student representing the Seeders must argue that
trust is the only sustainable resource. Students learn that every worldview
in a well-written book has internal logic worth understanding, even the ones
they disagree with. HOW TO
USE IT: Assign
factions by lottery — students argue positions they didn't choose. Give 48
hours to build a case from textual evidence. Run the debate as a structured
council session: each faction presents their governance philosophy, responds
to challenges, and proposes a post-crisis social contract. Debrief: which
arguments were strongest? Why? What did the author want us to believe? AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI as a debate prep coach. Prompt: 'I am arguing for the Iron Covenant's
philosophy as presented in this novel. Identify the three strongest
counterarguments a Seeders representative would make, and help me prepare
responses that stay true to the Iron Covenant's internal logic.' AI sharpens
both sides. |
|
10 THE LITERARY TRANSMISSION — WRITING FOR A REAL UNKNOWN READER Authentic audience as the most powerful writing motivator |
|
The
foundational problem with school writing is audience: students write for a
teacher who already knows the answer. The most powerful writing happens when
the audience is real, unknown, and genuinely needs what you've written. The
Literary Transmission asks students to write a survival guide, a warning, a
manifesto, or a story — addressed to a reader they will never meet, who may
need it someday. This
could be a time capsule letter to a student in 2075. A survival field guide
left in a community library's free box. A one-page zine placed in a Little
Free Library. A message tucked inside a used book donated back to a store.
The writing doesn't change — but the knowledge that it might actually be read
by a real stranger transforms how seriously students take every word. HOW TO
USE IT: Frame the
assignment around a future crisis scenario — climate displacement,
technological collapse, social fracture. Students write a 2-page document
addressing an unknown person navigating that crisis. Documents are sealed in
envelopes, labeled 'Open if you need this,' and placed in real community
locations. Follow-up: students write a reflection on what it felt like to
write for someone real. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI to pressure-test their transmission: 'I wrote this survival guide for
someone navigating a climate displacement scenario in 2075. What critical
information did I assume my reader already knows? What gaps might cost them?
Rewrite my opening paragraph to be clearer to someone with no prior context.'
AI teaches anticipating an audience. |
✦ BONUS IDEAS
Four Extended-Play Formats for Building a Reading Life That
Lasts
These four bonus formats go beyond
the single-session or single-unit structure of the core ideas. Each one is
designed to become a signature program — something students remember years
later as the thing that changed how they thought about reading, writing, and
world-building. They are bigger, messier, and more ambitious. They are also,
for exactly those reasons, the most likely to create genuine literary passion.
|
BONUS
01 READERS THEATER — STUDENTS BUILD THE
STAGE From page to performance: literature as living script |
|
Readers
Theater is not a play. There are no costumes, no set, no memorization. It is
a performance of literature using only voice, stillness, and the power of
words spoken aloud to a listening audience. And when students don't just
perform a Readers Theater script — but write one, adapting a novel, a short
story, or even a COG scenario into a multi-voice performance piece —
something remarkable happens: they read the source material with the
precision of surgeons. To write
a Readers Theater script, a student must identify who is speaking, who is
thinking, who is narrating, and which lines carry the emotional weight of the
scene. They must make cutting decisions — what stays, what goes, how to
convey what the prose showed in stage directions — using only voice. They
discover that literature is not a fixed object but a set of choices, and that
every choice the original author made was intentional. This is the closest
thing to authorial thinking that most students will ever practice. HOW TO
USE IT: Launch
with a short source text: a chapter from a novel, a pivotal scene from a
dystopian story, or a complete COG scenario. Students work in groups of 3–5
to adapt it into a Readers Theater script. Each script must include a
Narrator, at least two character voices, and a Chorus — a shared voice that
reads environmental description or internal emotional state together.
Rehearse for one week. Perform for another class or record as a podcast-style
audio drama. Debrief: what choices did each group make, and why? Compare
divergent adaptations of the same source text. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI as a script development partner. Prompt: 'Here is a scene from our
novel. I need to adapt it for 4 voices: a narrator, two characters in
conflict, and a chorus that reads the emotional subtext. Help me identify
which lines belong to each voice and flag any moments where the original
prose gives information that no single character could speak aloud — those
are the Chorus moments.' AI teaches students to read for voice and subtext
simultaneously. |
|
BONUS
02 THE STUDENT-BUILT RPG CAMPAIGN MODULE Design a complete tabletop adventure world — then run it for
real players |
|
A
campaign module is a self-contained adventure scenario designed for tabletop
role-playing games: a world with history, geography, factions, conflicts,
NPCs with names and motivations, dungeons with logic, and an overarching
story that responds to player choices. Writing one requires more sustained,
purposeful reading and writing than almost any other student project —
because the world must be coherent enough for a stranger to explore it. Students
choose their genre — high fantasy, space exploration, pirate maritime
adventure, noir urban mystery, solarpunk reconstruction — and spend 6–8 weeks
building a full campaign module: a regional map, a 10-entry bestiary, three
factions with competing agendas, a main quest with at least three branching
resolution paths, and a set of five encounter scenarios written as
scenario-text (like the After the Flash scenarios). The capstone: they run
their module as a live tabletop session for peers who have never seen the
world. The world must work. The story must land. The players must care. HOW TO
USE IT: Scaffold
with genre study first: students read (or play) one published module or
adventure scenario in their chosen genre — there are many free ones available
from indie publishers on itch.io. They analyze structure: how does the module
introduce the world? How does it manage player choice? How does it
communicate tone? Then they build. Weekly deliverables keep the project
moving: Week 1 world map and genre bible, Week 2 faction documents, Week 3
bestiary, Weeks 4–5 encounter scenarios, Week 6 main quest document, Week 7
full playtest with a peer group, Week 8 revision and final submission. The
final product is a printed, bound module — a real artifact. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI at every stage as a world-consistency checker and narrative
stress-tester. Prompt examples: 'Here are my three factions. Are their
motivations logically incompatible in a way that creates genuine conflict, or
do they seem too similar? What alliances would be historically inevitable?'
Or: 'Here is my main quest. A player just decided to ally with the villain
instead of opposing them. Write what happens next in a way that's consistent
with the world I've built.' AI becomes the Dungeon Master's assistant and the
first playtest partner. |
|
BONUS
03 THE LIVING ANTHOLOGY — A CLASS-BUILT
BOOK Real students. Real writing. Real publication. Real readers. |
|
The
single most powerful motivator for young writers — and therefore for the deep
reading that feeds good writing — is authentic publication. Not a grade. Not
a bulletin board display. A real book, with a real ISBN, that real strangers
can order. Print-on-demand platforms make this possible for any classroom.
When students know that their COG scenario, their one-page RPG, their Readers
Theater script, or their campaign encounter will be read by people they have
never met, the quality of their revision process transforms overnight. The
Living Anthology is a class-produced book that collects the semester's best
work: game scenarios, short fiction, world-building documents, character
studies, faction manifestos, and reflective essays. Students serve as
editors, cover designers, layout artists, and copyeditors as well as writers.
The editorial process — pitching pieces, workshopping, rejecting drafts and
revising — teaches the full lifecycle of professional writing. And the
finished book is carried home, given as a gift, placed in a Little Free
Library, and kept on a shelf for years. HOW TO
USE IT: Set the
anthology as the semester's North Star from Week 1. Every major assignment is
a potential submission. In the final four weeks, shift to editorial mode:
students pitch their best piece, receive peer editorial feedback in
structured workshop format, revise, submit final copy. A student editorial
board makes final selection decisions (with teacher guidance). Use a platform
like Lulu or KDP to produce physical copies — one per student, plus extras
for the school library. Host a launch reading event where student authors
read excerpts aloud to an invited audience. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI as a manuscript editor in the revision phase. Prompt: 'This is my
scenario for our class anthology. I want it to feel like the writing in the
After the Flash prototype — second-person, present tense, tense atmosphere,
moral weight at the decision point. Tell me specifically where my writing
falls short of that standard, and show me one rewritten sentence from each
weak section so I can see the gap.' AI becomes the editorial voice that helps
students reach professional-level prose. |
|
BONUS
04 THE GENRE DEEP-DIVE READING QUEST Self-directed literary exploration across a full genre
universe |
|
Most
students who say they don't like reading have never found their genre. They
have been assigned books — often books with cultural value but limited
personal resonance — and concluded that reading is not for them. The Genre
Deep-Dive Reading Quest is a structured self-directed exploration: each
student picks a genre they are genuinely curious about and reads deeply and
widely within it for an entire semester, building expertise, taste, and
eventually critical opinion. Genres
are broad and student-chosen: golden age science fiction, contemporary
climate fiction, manga, military historical fiction, magical realism, body
horror, cozy mystery, solarpunk, secondary world fantasy, nautical adventure,
Afrofuturism, Gothic literature. The student reads at least four books in
their genre, maintains a Genre Field Notes journal (documenting conventions,
tropes, standout techniques, and personal reactions), writes a mid-semester
Genre Report (what makes this genre work, and for whom), and presents a final
Genre Recommendation to the class: a 5-minute curated pitch for three books
in their genre that they genuinely believe their classmates should read. HOW TO
USE IT: Launch
with a genre fair: 20–30 books across diverse genres on display, with index
cards describing each. Students browse, handle, and choose. The physical
browsing matters — many students discover genres through covers and first
paragraphs. Require that at least one of the four books be an older text
(pre-2000) and one be from an author outside the student's own cultural
background. The Genre Field Notes journal is checked in weekly — it should
feel like an explorer's log, not a book report. End the semester with a Genre
Recommendation Festival: student presenters, audience members who take notes
and make their own to-read lists. AI
CO-DESIGN ANGLE: Students
use AI as a genre scholar and reading companion. Prompt: 'I am reading deep
into solarpunk fiction this semester. Based on the four books I've read so
far, help me identify the three defining philosophical tensions of the genre
— what does it believe about technology, community, and human nature? And
what's a fifth book I probably haven't found yet that would challenge or
complicate the pattern I'm seeing?' AI becomes the knowledgeable friend who
has read everything in the genre and wants to make sure you don't miss the
essential texts. |
Implementation:
Where to Start
Not every idea requires the same
investment. Here is a practical entry ladder:
Start Tomorrow (No prep
required)
•
Read Scenario 01 of After
the Flash aloud. Stop before the choices. Ask students to close their eyes and
decide. Debrief.
•
Bring 20 used books to
class and give students 10 minutes to choose one based on instinct alone.
That's Artifact #1.
This Week (Light scaffolding)
•
Assign a vocabulary set.
Ask students to build a world governed by those words. Share in pairs.
•
Identify the decision point
in your current novel unit. Write your own ending before revealing the
author's.
This Semester (Full
implementation)
•
Run the Student-Built
Gamebook Series as a 6-week creative writing unit.
•
Launch the Duet Adventure
as a 1-on-1 correspondence project between teacher and each student.
•
Host a Zine Fair at the end
of the semester with one-page RPGs students designed and playtested.
The Real Goal
The goal is not to recreate the
past — to drag students away from screens by force and sit them in silent rows
with paperbacks. That battle is already lost, and it was always the wrong
battle.
The goal is to build students who
know what deep reading feels like in their bodies — the focus, the inhabitation
of another mind, the satisfaction of a complex idea resolved — and who choose
it, sometimes, because they have learned what it gives them that nothing else
can.
A student who has played the world
they designed, whose peer survived a scenario they wrote, who argued for a
fictional faction's philosophy using textual evidence, who wrote a transmission
for an unknown reader in 2075 and tucked it into a Little Free Library — that
student is not just a reader.
That student is a builder of
worlds. And builders of worlds read, because that is where the best worlds come
from.
—
This document was developed
using the After the Flash: A Mind Game of Survival, Faction, and Fire prototype
as a model for Cognitive Game Book design. The After the Flash materials,
including Kai Vasquez, the faction system, all ten scenarios, and Kai's Field
Record, are original works.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!