The Texas Miracle/Lie That Broke American Education: A 25-Year Fraud Still Costing You and Your Students
For every teacher drowning in test prep, every principal gaming enrollment numbers, every district leader buying rebranded curriculum with Common Core stickers slapped on the cover—this is where it started. And it was always a lie.
The Original Lie: When Fraud Became Federal Policy
In the late 1990s, something miraculous was supposedly happening in Houston schools. Dropout rates plummeted to 1.5%. Test scores soared. Achievement gaps closed. One high school—Sharpstown High—reported zero dropouts in 2001-2002.
Zero.
They went from 1,000 freshmen to 300 seniors with no dropouts. As Assistant Principal Robert Kimball put it: "Amazing!"
This "Texas miracle" became the centerpiece of George W. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign. He promised to replicate it nationally. Once elected, he appointed Houston Superintendent Rod Paige as Secretary of Education and, with help from his Texas education adviser, pushed through No Child Left Behind in 2001.
There was just one problem: The Texas miracle was completely fraudulent.
How They Did It: A Masterclass in Educational Fraud
When Kimball blew the whistle in 2003, the truth came out:
The dropout numbers were fabricated. A state audit of just 16 Houston schools found that of 5,500 teenagers who had left school, 3,000 should have been counted as dropouts but weren't. The district's reported 1.5% dropout rate was actually closer to 40%.
Schools created dozens of bureaucratic categories for students who left: "pursuing a GED," "returning to Mexico," "transferred" (with no verification). The Texas Education Agency even started classifying students who met all graduation requirements but failed the state test as non-dropout "leavers."
Low-performing students were pushed out. As Professor Linda McNeil of Rice University explained: "The accountability system itself is producing many of these losses. The system 'works,' that is, produces positive indicators, only when it loses enough of the low-achieving kids, because they are seen as 'liabilities' to the school's rating."
Sound familiar? Twenty-five years later, you're still living this reality.
The pressure system was ruthless. Principals worked on one-year contracts. Meet your numbers, earn bonuses up to $5,000. Fall short, get transferred, demoted, or forced out. Kimball told The New York Times: "You need to understand the atmosphere in Houston. People are afraid…Panicky. They have to make their numbers."
You understand that atmosphere. You're living in it right now.
Test scores were manipulated. Schools excluded low-performing students from testing. They devoted massive class time to test-specific drilling that produced higher scores on state tests while SAT scores for college-bound students actually dropped.
Dr. Walt Haney of Boston College published the definitive research in 2000: "The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education." He told the Washington Post: "What is happening in Texas seems to me to be not just an illusion, but from an educational point of view, an outright fraud."
His research revealed that over a five-year period, an additional 100,000 Black and Hispanic students did not graduate from Texas high schools as a direct result of high-stakes testing. The graduation rate for Black and Latino students fell from 60% to 50% after the state test was imposed in 1991.
The RAND Corporation study (2000) found large discrepancies between state test results and national assessments, with the most plausible explanation being that schools were devoting massive class time to highly specific test preparation rather than actual learning.
Congress Ignored the Evidence
Here's the part that should enrage you: The fraud was exposed before No Child Left Behind passed.
Walt Haney published his findings in 2000. RAND published their critical review the same year. Both were ignored when Congress debated NCLB in 2001.
They knew. They passed it anyway.
And the Texas adviser who helped craft NCLB? He began consulting for the testing company that held Texas's contracts—contracts worth nearly $500 million for five years. The architect of our national testing regime now lobbies for the companies profiting from it. Oh, and his own children attend private schools untouched by the accountability system he created for yours.
From NCLB to Common Core: The Sequel Nobody Wanted
You might think the disaster of NCLB would have taught us something. Instead, we got Common Core—same fraud, new branding.
The playbook was identical:
1. Create artificial urgency. Race to the Top offered federal funding, but states that adopted "college and career-ready standards" by August 2, 2010 got extra points in their applications. Forty-one states made the promise.
2. Use private wealth to bypass democracy. A major foundation spent over $200 million promoting Common Core between 2008-2014, funding advocacy groups, research organizations, and state implementation. The same foundation's founder was meeting with Jeffrey Epstein during this period, but apparently his judgment was considered sound enough to reshape American education for millions of children.
3. Enrich testing companies. The same company that held Texas's testing contracts for three decades played a role in crafting Common Core standards. When states needed aligned tests, the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) put out a request for proposals—and the contract went to the only bidder. That company now earns $7 billion in U.S. curriculum sales every year, while their closest competitor earns only $2 billion, and thanks to Common Core, they only need to design one test per subject and modify it slightly for 39 states.
4. Profit from the infrastructure. Computer-based testing suddenly became essential. Districts like Los Angeles committed $1 billion for tablets—money taken from a bond issue voters approved for construction and repair of facilities. They cut arts teachers, increased class sizes, and deferred necessary repairs to buy devices for tests.
5. Deliver shoddy products with no accountability. This is where your experience comes in. Districts nationwide received "Common Core-aligned" materials that were just old stock with new stickers pasted over them. Publishers didn't have time to develop genuinely new curriculum, so they rebranded what they already had.
You know this happened. You opened those boxes. You saw those stickers.
The Financial Devastation: Following the Money
Let's talk about what this fraud has cost over 25 years:
Testing industry: $2-3 billion annually. For a quarter century. That's $50-75 billion spent on tests that measure test-taking ability rather than learning.
Curriculum materials: $8-10 billion annually in instructional materials. But here's the scam: districts adopt new curriculum every 5-7 years regardless of whether current materials work. This "curriculum churn" prevents teachers from developing expertise with any approach and ensures publishers get perpetual revenue.
Technology infrastructure: Over $100 billion globally on education technology, much of it becoming obsolete before providing educational value.
Professional development: Billions spent training teachers on initiatives that get replaced before they can fully implement them.
But the financial costs aren't even the worst part.
The Educational Devastation: What 25 Years of Fraud Did to Schools
Your school became a test prep academy. Especially if you work in a lower-performing school in an under-resourced community, your building has been transformed into a testing factory where "little real learning takes place," as researchers documented.
Your curriculum narrowed. Arts, music, social studies, science—anything not tested got squeezed out. You know this. You watched it happen.
Your professional judgment became worthless. The message of the past 25 years has been clear: teachers can't be trusted. Data will save us. Experts (who've never taught) know better than you.
Your students became liabilities or assets. High-performers boost your numbers. Low-performers threaten them. The incentive structure literally encourages pushing out struggling kids.
Your principals became middle managers. Instead of instructional leaders, they became data analysts and compliance officers, monitoring your test scores and checking if you're "on pace" with pacing guides.
Your autonomy disappeared. Scripted curricula, mandated interventions, required data meetings, prescribed responses to student behavior—all because a fraudulent "miracle" in Texas convinced policymakers that teachers needed to be controlled.
Why Nothing Changes: The Structural Trap
You might wonder: if the fraud was exposed in 2000, why are we still living with it in 2026?
Because the incentive structure rewards fraud.
For companies: Education contracts specify delivery of materials, not student outcomes. Publishers promise "research-based improvements" but aren't liable when results disappoint. By the time a curriculum demonstrably fails (3-5 years), the company has been paid, administrators who made purchasing decisions have moved to other jobs, and the cycle begins again with a new "research-based" solution.
For administrators: Adopting fashionable reforms provides political cover. Appearing "resistant to innovation" carries career risk. But if reforms fail, they can blame implementation, teacher resistance, or insufficient funding—rarely does the original decision get scrutinized.
For state officials: The revolving door between public office and private sector lobbying is lucrative. Craft the policies, then consult for the companies that profit from them.
For federal policymakers: Private foundations fund the research, advocacy, and implementation infrastructure. Policymakers can claim they're following "evidence" without acknowledging that the same entities funding the research are also funding its promotion.
Meanwhile, you—the teacher trying to actually educate children—have no power in this system. You're just expected to implement whatever the latest reform demands.
What You're Actually Experiencing Right Now
Let me name what you're living through:
You're being asked to personalize learning with class sizes of 35+. The same people who cut staff are selling you AI-powered adaptive learning platforms.
You're implementing "research-based interventions" that aren't working. Because the research was funded by the company selling the intervention.
You're attending professional development for initiatives that will be abandoned next year. Because curriculum churn keeps publishers profitable.
You're entering data into multiple systems that don't talk to each other. Each purchased separately, none actually improving instruction.
You're being evaluated based on test scores that measure socioeconomic status more than teaching quality. Because the accountability system was always designed to blame teachers for structural inequality.
You're watching students disengage as school becomes an endless cycle of test prep. Because that's what happens when you optimize for metrics rather than learning.
This is the legacy of the Texas lie. This is what 25 years of fraud-based reform has created.
The Whistleblower's Fate: A Warning
Remember Robert Kimball, the assistant principal who exposed the Houston dropout fraud?
After blowing the whistle, he was immediately removed from his duties and placed in a windowless room for four months with no responsibilities. Then he was assigned to a small primary school with a reduced pay grade and given menial custodial and clerical duties. The district hoped to humiliate him into resigning.
This is how accountability systems treat those who demand actual accountability.
If you've ever wondered why administrators don't push back on obviously harmful mandates, why teachers don't speak up about curricula that don't work, why principals manipulate enrollment numbers—now you know. The system punishes honesty and rewards compliance.
What Would Real Accountability Look Like?
After 25 years of fraud, you deserve to know what genuine accountability would require:
Performance-based contracts: Vendors get paid in full only if independently verified student outcomes improve over multiple years. Risk transfers to companies making promises.
Independent evaluation: Researchers with no financial ties to vendors or foundations conduct rigorous multi-year studies before large-scale adoption.
Fraud enforcement: Criminal prosecution for deliberately falsified data. Clawback provisions when fraud is discovered. Personal liability for administrators who make purchasing decisions involving conflicts of interest.
Curriculum stability: Commit to materials for 7-10 years, allowing teachers to develop genuine expertise instead of constantly learning new systems.
Teacher voice: Educators with actual classroom experience make curriculum and assessment decisions, not corporate consultants or foundation program officers.
End the revolving door: Mandatory cooling-off periods preventing education officials from lobbying for companies they previously regulated or purchased from.
None of this will happen under current structures. The system is working exactly as designed—just not for you or your students.
The Truth You Already Know
You don't need me to tell you any of this. You're living it.
You know the new curriculum isn't better than the old curriculum. You know the professional development is performative. You know the data meetings are theater. You know the test scores don't measure what matters. You know your struggling students need smaller classes and more support, not more computerized interventions.
You've known all of this for years.
What you might not have known is that it started with a lie. A deliberate, documented, exposed lie about dropout rates in Houston. A lie that researchers debunked before it became national policy. A lie that enriched testing companies and education consultants and foundation program officers while bleeding billions from public schools.
A lie that turned your profession into compliance work and your students into data points.
25 Years Later: Students Are Still Paying the Price
Here's what the Texas lie cost the children in your classroom:
They lost arts, music, PE, and recess to make time for test prep.
They lost experienced teachers who left the profession because it became unbearable.
They lost joy in learning because school became an anxiety-producing testing factory.
They lost curriculum depth because coverage replaced mastery, breadth replaced depth.
They lost relationships with teachers who became frantic managers of pacing guides rather than mentors.
They lost equitable funding as billions went to testing companies and technology vendors instead of reducing class sizes or increasing teacher pay.
They lost the promise of public education as a democratic institution and received instead a market-based system optimized for corporate profit.
And here's the cruelest part: the students who paid the highest price were the ones the system claimed to help—low-income students and students of color in under-resourced schools that became pure testing academies.
The "Texas miracle" was built on pushing out Black and Hispanic students. That wasn't a bug. That was the feature. And we've been replicating it for 25 years.
What Now?
I can't tell you this gets better. The testing companies are doing fine—one holds a 40% market share and expects demand to increase despite federal mandates changing. Their vice president said: "I don't see things changing for us much in terms of the size of our business. People are just going to be moving towards other kinds of testing."
Translation: We've captured the market. We're fine.
You're not fine. Your students aren't fine. But the people profiting from education reform are doing great.
So what do you do?
You name it. You call it what it is: fraud. Not "well-intentioned reform that didn't work." Not "research-based practice that needs better implementation." Fraud. Deliberate, documented, exposed fraud that became national policy anyway.
You refuse complicity where you can. You know which practices harm students. Do less of those. You know what actually works. Do more of that. Within your classroom, you still have some autonomy. Use it.
You tell the truth. When administrators ask why test scores aren't improving, you can name the real reasons: 35 students per class, inadequate support for special needs, students experiencing homelessness, outdated materials, insufficient planning time. Stop protecting a fraudulent system by pretending you just need to "do better."
You document. When you receive curriculum materials that are clearly just rebranded old stock, document it. When professional development is useless, document it. When initiatives get abandoned before implementation, document it. Someone needs to be recording this ongoing fraud.
You build solidarity. You're not alone in knowing this system is broken. Every teacher knows. Talk to each other. Support each other. Stop pretending the emperor has clothes.
You remember this isn't your fault. You didn't create this mess. A fraudulent "miracle" in Houston became national policy because it enriched the right people. You're just trying to educate children in the wreckage.
The Bottom Line
For 25 years, American education policy has been based on a lie. The Texas miracle was a fraud. Everyone knew it was a fraud. We built No Child Left Behind on that fraud anyway. Then we built Common Core and Race to the Top on the same fraudulent foundation.
The people who created this system are fine. The companies profiting from it are fine. The foundation heads and consultants and former officials turned lobbyists are fine.
You're drowning in data entry and test prep and curriculum churn and professional development for initiatives that will be abandoned next year.
Your students are losing arts and music and recess and joy.
And somewhere, someone is printing new stickers to slap on old curriculum, preparing to sell you the "next big thing" in education reform.
It's been 25 years. The fraud continues.
But at least now you know where it started.
For Robert Kimball, who told the truth and paid the price.
For every teacher still fighting for actual learning in a system optimized for profit.
For every student who deserved better than this 25-year lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!