CLASSROOMS OF THE FUTURE
A Full-Stack Framework for
Preschool–Grade 12
Building Ohana · Curiosity ·
Collaboration · AI / Computer Science Fluency · Love of Learning
Inspired by: Scandinavian Education · Reggio Emilia ·
Montessori · Kagan Cooperative Learning
Stanford Design Thinking · Harkness Seminar · Odyssey of the Mind · Socratic Seminar
|
Parents |
Is your child future-ready? Our
free PreK–12 framework shows exactly what skills kids need in the age of AI —
beyond test scores. |
|
Educators |
A research-backed K–12 framework
blending AI fluency, design thinking, cooperative learning, and human skills
for every grade level. |
|
Admin / Policy |
Move beyond standardized
testing. A McKinsey-style analysis of future-ready education — with
grade-level skill guides, PreK–Grade 12. |
A
McKinsey-Style Full-Stack Analysis for Parents, Educators & Administrators
"The illiterate of the 21st
century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot
learn, unlearn, and relearn." — Alvin Toffler
THE PROBLEM: 25
YEARS OF MISALIGNED INCENTIVES
Since the passage of No Child Left
Behind in 2001, the dominant paradigm in American (and much of Anglo-world)
education has been accountability through standardized testing. The data on
what this produced is unambiguous — and not in the way policymakers intended.
|
What We Measured |
What We Missed |
|
Reading/Math scores on
standardized tests |
Curiosity, creativity, love of
learning |
|
Compliance and seat time |
Collaboration, teamwork,
leadership |
|
Grade-level averages |
Individual growth trajectories |
|
Content recall |
Critical thinking and synthesis |
|
Individual achievement |
Cooperative and collective
intelligence |
|
Test preparation skills |
Resilience, executive function,
metacognition |
The Scandinavian model —
particularly Finland and Sweden's individualized approach — demonstrates
consistently that when we trust teachers, honor child development, embed play
and inquiry, and assess growth rather than sorting, outcomes across all measures
improve. Finland regularly tops international rankings while testing students
the least. Sweden's individualized education plans (IEPs for all students) give
families a transparent, collaborative roadmap.
This framework draws on the
best of multiple proven systems — and layers in the skills the AI age demands.
THE FRAMEWORK: FIVE PILLARS OF FUTURE-READY
LEARNING
|
π Academic Core |
π€ Human Skills |
π§ Executive Function |
♟️ Strategic Thinking |
π€ AI & Tech
Fluency |
|
Grounded in CPA
learning — Concrete, Pictorial, Abstract — with Montessori math, structured
literacy, and hands-on science inquiry |
Empathy,
collaboration, conflict resolution, ohana culture, growth mindset, emotional
regulation, cultural appreciation |
Attention,
working memory, cognitive flexibility, self-regulation, metacognition,
goal-setting, time management |
Systems
thinking, design thinking, Socratic reasoning, Odyssey of the Mind, wicked
problem solving, scenario planning |
Prompt
engineering, Python, data literacy, agentic AI collaboration, digital
citizenship, AI ethics |
THE PEDAGOGICAL ARCHITECTURE: HOW WE TEACH
|
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT |
LEARNING STRUCTURES |
LEARNING COMMUNITY |
|
Multi-age
classrooms (2–3 year bands) modeled on Montessori and Nordic practice. The
atelier as studio: materials, beauty, and provocation everywhere. Flexible
spaces for solo, pair, small group, and full community work. |
Kagan
Cooperative Learning structures as daily practice. Harkness Seminars for
student-led inquiry. Socratic seminars for dialectical reasoning. Odyssey of
the Mind for complex team challenges. Spontaneous problems weekly. Stanford
Design Thinking for real-world application. |
Ohana: we are a
family of learners. Cross-age mentoring embedded at every level. Parent as
partner — three-way conferences (student, teacher, parent) using this
framework. Teacher as atelier director: observing, provoking, documenting.
Students as teachers: peer tutoring, expert groups, capstone teaching. |
THE ASSESSMENT MODEL: SWEDISH-INSPIRED
GROWTH FRAMEWORK
Assessment is a conversation, not a
verdict. Inspired by Sweden's individualized education planning, every student
has a transparent roadmap. There are no secrets. Parents, students, and
teachers use the same guide.
|
Level |
What It Means |
Threshold |
|
EMERGING |
Student is
building foundational understanding. Skills are present with significant
support. Not yet demonstrating consistent application. |
< 50% |
|
PASS ✓ |
Student
demonstrates core skills and knowledge consistently with occasional support.
Participates meaningfully in collaborative structures. Shows understanding
across most learning objectives. |
50–74% |
|
HIGH PASS ★ |
Student
demonstrates mastery and can apply, transfer, teach, and extend learning.
Leads collaborative structures. Produces original thinking. Connects ideas
across domains. |
75–100% |
Evidence of
mastery is collected across portfolios, observations, performances, peer
feedback, self-reflection, and project outcomes — never from a single
high-stakes test.
WHAT THE RESEARCH SAYS: WHAT HAS NOT WORKED
|
Approach That Hasn't Worked |
Evidence-Based Alternative |
|
High-stakes
testing as primary driver of curriculum and instruction (NCLB, ESSA) |
Portfolio
assessment + growth indicators + skills-based mastery (Finland, Denmark) |
|
5-paragraph
essay as the dominant writing form |
Multi-modal,
purposeful writing for real audiences: argument, research, collaboration with
AI |
|
Ability grouping
and tracking by test score |
Multi-age,
mixed-ability cooperative learning (Kagan, Vygotsky ZPD) |
|
Passive
reception: lecture → worksheet → test |
CPA learning:
concrete → pictorial → abstract; student as constructor of knowledge |
|
Independent,
competitive academic culture |
Ohana/community
model: peer tutoring, team challenges, collaborative inquiry |
|
Technology as
content delivery (edtech drill software) |
Technology as
creative and analytical tool: programming, AI collaboration, data science |
|
Content coverage
racing to the test |
Depth over
breadth: fewer concepts, mastered deeply, transferred flexibly |
|
Teacher as sole
knowledge authority |
Teacher as
atelier director; students as co-researchers and peer teachers |
HOW TO USE THESE GRADE-LEVEL GUIDES
Each guide on the following pages is
a one-page (or one-screen) reference for:
•
Parents: to understand what your child is developing,
to have informed conversations with teachers, and to support learning at home
•
Students: to see where they are headed, what counts as
growing well, and to take ownership of their learning journey
•
Teachers: to align daily instruction with whole-child
development goals
•
Administrators: to evaluate program coherence across
five skill domains
The guides are organized in five
columns matching the Five Pillars. Each skill is observable and assessable. The
Pass/High Pass descriptors give clear, human-centered benchmarks — not test
scores.
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — PRESCHOOL (AGES 3–5)
|
Preschool
(Ages 3–5) Wonder, Play
& Foundation |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Child can recognize and produce 20+ phonemes, count to 10,
identify basic shapes/colors, follow 2-step instructions, and participate in
group activities with support. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Child produces all 44 phonemes in context, demonstrates number
sense to 20, extends patterns independently, initiates cooperative play, and
expresses empathy verbally. |
|||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — KINDERGARTEN (AGE 5–6)
|
Kindergarten
(Age 5–6) Phonics,
Curiosity & Team Belonging |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Reads 30+ sight words, decodes CVC words, writes 2–3 sentences,
adds/subtracts within 10, participates in paired tasks with prompting. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Reads emergent texts independently, writes 5+ sentence stories
with punctuation, solves addition/subtraction within 20, leads a pair sharing
activity, initiates problem-solving strategies. |
|||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADE 1 (AGE 6–7)
|
Grade 1 (Age
6–7) Decoding,
Number Sense & Peer Learning |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Reads grade-level text at 40 WCPM with comprehension, writes a
structured paragraph, solves addition/subtraction within 100 using visual
strategies, participates in Kagan structures. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Reads above grade-level texts with inferencing, writes
multi-paragraph narratives, solves within 100 mentally with explanation,
leads a peer-tutoring session, designs a solution to a class problem. |
||||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADE 2 (AGE 7–8)
|
Grade 2 (Age
7–8) Fluency, Data
Thinking & Collaborative Inquiry |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Reads grade-level texts with comprehension, writes 3-paragraph
pieces, computes within 1000 using strategies, participates in group
discussion with prompting. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Reads above grade-level with analysis, writes persuasive pieces
with evidence, multiplies fluently using arrays, leads Jigsaw expert group,
designs and evaluates a survey. |
||||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADE 3 (AGE 8–9)
|
Grade 3 (Age
8–9) Deep Reading,
Multiplication & Design Thinking |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Reads grade-level text with analysis, writes research-based
reports, multiplies/divides within 100 fluently, completes design thinking
cycle with support, contributes to Harkness discussion. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Reads above grade-level with authorial analysis, produces
persuasive research writing, demonstrates fraction mastery, leads a full
design cycle, facilitates a Harkness seminar. |
||||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADE 4 (AGE 9–10)
|
Grade 4 (Age
9–10) Analytical
Thinking, Systems & Team Leadership |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Reads complex texts with point-of-view analysis, writes
multi-paragraph arguments with evidence, multiplies/divides multi-digit
numbers, manages a team role, uses prompt engineering with support. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Synthesizes multiple texts critically, produces researched
arguments independently, demonstrates fraction operations fluency, leads team
through Tuckman stages, designs and iterates AI prompts. |
|||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADE 5 (AGE 10–11)
|
Grade 5 (Age
10–11) Research,
Reasoning & Collaborative Expertise |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Analyzes texts with thematic depth, writes researched essays with
citations, operates with fractions and decimals, manages a 6-week project
independently, facilitates a Harkness discussion. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Produces original literary criticism, writes evidence-based
arguments at MS level, demonstrates pre-algebra fluency, leads a full Odyssey
of the Mind solution, designs multi-turn AI prompts. |
|||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADES 6–8 (MIDDLE SCHOOL, AGES 11–14)
|
Grades 6–8
(Middle School, Ages 11–14) Critical
Analysis, Team Mastery & Real-World Application |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Analyzes complex texts rhetorically, writes synthesis arguments,
demonstrates Algebra readiness, manages semester project, leads team with
structure, uses Python for basic data analysis. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Produces original critical essays, completes Algebra 1 with
mastery, leads a design challenge from problem to prototype, facilitates
dialectical seminars, builds AI-augmented data tools. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL
SKILLS GUIDE — GRADES 9–10 (EARLY HIGH SCHOOL, AGES 14–16)
|
Grades 9–10
(Early High School, Ages 14–16) Strategic
Thinking, Synthesis & Emerging Voice |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Writes AP-level analysis, demonstrates Algebra 2 skills, designs
an experiment, leads a team project, builds a functional AI-augmented tool,
contributes to civic engagement project. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Publishes original research, demonstrates advanced mathematics,
leads multi-team design initiatives, produces AI ethics framework, mentors
younger students, authors a futures scenario analysis. |
|||||||||||||||||||
GRADE-LEVEL SKILLS GUIDE — GRADES 11–12 (SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, AGES 16–18)
|
Grades 11–12
(Senior High School, Ages 16–18) Mastery,
Leadership & Contribution to the World |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
✓ PASS (50%
Mastery) Completes Capstone with documented evidence of growth,
demonstrates AP-level mastery in pathway, leads a real team to a tangible
outcome, produces an AI ethics proposal, publishes final research. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75% Mastery) Capstone earns community recognition or is adopted; demonstrates
college-ready excellence in pathway; leads cross-sector initiative; AI ethics
framework submitted to real organization; accepted to selective
post-secondary pathway. |
|||||||||||||||||||
BUILDING THE FUTURE TOGETHER
Implementation Roadmap for Schools
|
Phase |
Focus |
Key Actions |
|
Year 1
Foundation |
Structures
& Culture |
Implement Kagan
structures school-wide. Launch Harkness seminar pilots. Establish ohana
culture norms. Train all staff in CPA mathematics. Begin weekly spontaneous
problem. Parent orientation using grade-level guides. |
|
Year 2
Deepening |
Integration
& Skill Building |
Embed Design
Thinking across subjects. Launch Odyssey of the Mind. Introduce prompt
engineering curriculum. Establish cross-age mentoring program. Implement
portfolio assessment replacing standardized test prep. |
|
Year 3
Transformation |
Agency &
Leadership |
Students
co-design curriculum units. Launch senior capstone program. Establish school
as living laboratory. Share model with district. Develop community
partnerships. Student-led three-way conferences. |
|
Ongoing Evolution |
Continuous
Learning |
Annual
curriculum review using emerging AI/workforce data. Teacher atelier:
collaborative professional learning. Parent partnership: regular family
learning nights. Student voice: formal input on school design. |
A Final Word: The Skills That AI Cannot
Replace
Artificial intelligence will become
extraordinarily capable at tasks that require pattern recognition, content
generation, data analysis, and logical inference. It will not — in any
foreseeable future — replicate what happens when a human being looks another
human being in the eyes and genuinely cares about their growth. It cannot feel
the electricity of a classroom where twenty young minds are wrestling together
with a problem that matters. It cannot replace the teacher who notices that a
child who was laughing yesterday is silent today.
The skills in this framework —
empathy, collaboration, moral reasoning, creative vision, resilience,
curiosity, love — are not 'soft.' They are the hardest skills to develop and
the most enduring. They are what ohana is made of. They are what will carry our
children through a world that will change faster than any framework can
predict.
Build the culture. Trust the children. Love the learning.
|
INDIVIDUELL UTVECKLINGSPLAN Individual Development Plan ·
IUP Classroom of the Future A Skills & Knowledge Checklist for
Every Child, Preschool through Grade 12 Inspired by the Swedish Individuell
Utvecklingsplan (IUP) · Established 2006 A mandatory, living document — reviewed
each marking period by teacher, student, and parent together. |
|
☐ Emerging |
☐ Pass (50%+ Mastery) |
★ High Pass (75%+ Mastery) |
|
Building
foundations. Skills present with support. Not yet demonstrating consistent
independent application. |
Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates meaningfully. Occasional guidance
needed. |
Applies,
transfers, teaches, and extends learning. Leads. Produces original thinking.
Connects across domains. |
|
HOW TO USE THIS IUP 1. Before the conference — Teacher completes a
draft based on observation and portfolio evidence. 2. During the three-way conference — Student,
teacher, and parent review each skill together. Check each item: Emerging,
Pass, or High Pass. 3. Narrative sections — Fill in
collaboratively, centering the student's voice. 4. Sign and date — All three parties commit to
the goals and the support plan. 5. Next conference — Pull out this IUP. Review
growth. Update. Celebrate. |
|
π Academic |
π€ Human Skills |
π§ Executive
Function |
♟️ Strategic Thinking |
π₯ Collaborative |
π€ AI & Tech |
Grade-level IUPs follow on the next pages — one per grade
level, Preschool through Grade 12.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Preschool ·
Ages 3–5 Wonder,
Play & Foundation |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Recognizes
and produces 20+ of the 44 English phonemes |
|
☐ |
Identifies
letters by name (uppercase and lowercase A–Z) |
|
☐ |
Counts
objects 1–10 with one-to-one correspondence |
|
☐ |
Recognizes
basic shapes: circle, square, triangle, rectangle |
|
☐ |
Identifies
primary and secondary colors |
|
☐ |
Extends
simple AB, AAB, and ABB patterns |
|
☐ |
Retells a
simple story with a beginning, middle, and end |
|
☐ |
Draws
pictures to represent ideas; attempts mark-making for writing |
|
☐ |
Asks and
answers questions about a text read aloud |
|
☐ |
Sorts and
classifies objects by color, shape, or size |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
curiosity through observation and questioning |
|
☐ |
Makes
predictions using prior knowledge |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Names and
identifies basic emotions (happy, sad, angry, scared, surprised) |
|
☐ |
Uses words
instead of actions when upset (emerging self-regulation) |
|
☐ |
Takes turns
and shares materials with peers |
|
☐ |
Greets
classmates and adults with respect |
|
☐ |
Participates
in group routines and circle time |
|
☐ |
Shows care
and kindness toward a peer in need |
|
☐ |
Follows
classroom ohana (community) agreements with support |
|
☐ |
Engages in
cooperative dramatic play, taking on a role |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Follows a
2-step direction consistently |
|
☐ |
Stays
focused on a chosen task for 5–10 minutes |
|
☐ |
Transitions
between activities using a visual schedule |
|
☐ |
Waits for a
turn (impulse control emerging) |
|
☐ |
Tidies own
workspace when done |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Tries more
than one approach when a first attempt fails |
|
☐ |
Participates
in 'What would happen if…' exploration |
|
☐ |
Builds with
blocks or materials with a visible intention |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a simple verbal problem posed by teacher |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Works
alongside a partner on a shared project |
|
☐ |
Listens when
a peer is speaking (body, eyes, brain ready) |
|
☐ |
Contributes
one idea during a group discussion |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a group art or building project |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Understands
that computers follow instructions (cause-and-effect thinking) |
|
☐ |
Listens to
an AI-narrated story and asks a question about it |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
kind and respectful language use on digital tools |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Kindergarten ·
Ages 5–6 Phonics,
Curiosity & Team Belonging |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Decodes CVC
(consonant-vowel-consonant) words correctly |
|
☐ |
Reads 30+
Dolch sight words fluently |
|
☐ |
Reads simple
decodable texts with expression |
|
☐ |
Writes 2–3
complete sentences with spaces between words |
|
☐ |
Uses capital
letters and end punctuation |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 10 using objects, fingers, and drawings |
|
☐ |
Understands
place value: tens and ones with base-ten blocks |
|
☐ |
Identifies
coins and their values |
|
☐ |
Describes
the life cycle of a plant or animal |
|
☐ |
Asks
testable questions and records observations |
|
☐ |
Explains the
roles of family and community helpers |
|
☐ |
Compares and
orders objects by length and weight |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Identifies
and labels a full range of emotions in self and others |
|
☐ |
Uses 'I
feel…because…' sentence frames to express emotions |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to building the class ohana (community) agreements |
|
☐ |
Resolves
minor conflicts using a peace corner or 'I' statement |
|
☐ |
Celebrates
differences: identifies one way they are unique, one way they are like a
classmate |
|
☐ |
Cares for
classroom materials and shared spaces |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
growth mindset language ('I can't do it yet') |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Sustains
focused attention on a task for 10–15 minutes |
|
☐ |
Uses a
personal checklist to track daily tasks |
|
☐ |
Organizes
personal materials in a designated space |
|
☐ |
Asks for
help when needed rather than giving up |
|
☐ |
Recognizes
when work is complete vs. incomplete |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Uses the
3-step problem frame: What do I know? What do I need? What can I try? |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a weekly verbal spontaneous problem (timed, oral response) |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a partner design challenge (build with 20 blocks) |
|
☐ |
Names at
least two different strategies for solving a math problem |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Participates
in Think-Pair-Share with a consistent partner |
|
☐ |
Takes the
role of Reader or Questioner in partner reading |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to a group mural or collaborative art project |
|
☐ |
Listens
without interrupting during partner sharing |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Understands
that a computer needs clear, specific instructions |
|
☐ |
Evaluates an
AI-read-aloud answer: 'Did it get that right?' |
|
☐ |
Identifies
private information that should not be shared online |
|
☐ |
Participates
in an unplugged algorithm sequencing activity |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
1 ·
Ages 6–7 Decoding,
Number Sense & Peer Learning |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 40–60 words per minute with comprehension |
|
☐ |
Decodes
words with digraphs (ch, sh, th), blends, and long vowel patterns |
|
☐ |
Identifies
main idea and 2–3 supporting details in a text |
|
☐ |
Writes a
paragraph with a topic sentence and 2–3 supporting sentences |
|
☐ |
Uses capital
letters, commas, and end punctuation correctly |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 100 using concrete and pictorial strategies |
|
☐ |
Understands
place value: hundreds, tens, ones |
|
☐ |
Measures
length using non-standard and standard units (cm, inches) |
|
☐ |
Tells time
to the hour and half-hour |
|
☐ |
Reads and
creates bar graphs and picture graphs |
|
☐ |
Observes and
describes animal life cycles |
|
☐ |
Identifies
physical properties of materials (solid, liquid, gas) |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Identifies
personal strengths and records one in a weekly strength journal |
|
☐ |
Listens with
full body, brain, and heart (active listening protocol) |
|
☐ |
Honors
different learning styles: my way is not the only way |
|
☐ |
Practices a
3-minute mindfulness/breathing routine daily |
|
☐ |
Encourages a
peer using specific, genuine praise |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
perseverance after a first failed attempt |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a class job that serves the community |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Breaks a 2–3
step task into parts independently |
|
☐ |
Uses a
personal daily agenda or task checklist |
|
☐ |
Identifies a
frustration trigger and names it before acting |
|
☐ |
Estimates
how long a task will take and checks accuracy |
|
☐ |
Stays on
task with one reminder or none |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Participates
in a monthly team design challenge (Odyssey of the Mind style) |
|
☐ |
Contributes
a verbal response to a weekly spontaneous problem (timed) |
|
☐ |
Begins the
Design Thinking EMPATHIZE stage: interviews a classmate about a problem |
|
☐ |
Explains a
math solution using more than one strategy |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Uses Kagan
Rally Robin and Numbered Heads Together structures |
|
☐ |
Serves as
peer tutor in math using concrete materials |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Harkness-lite small group discussion |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to a group discussion talking map (tracks who has spoken) |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
simple sequence in Scratch Jr (3+ blocks with a clear outcome) |
|
☐ |
Distinguishes
between a vague and specific computer instruction |
|
☐ |
Evaluates
one AI-generated answer for accuracy with teacher support |
|
☐ |
Completes an
unplugged coding sequence activity (algorithm cards) |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
2 ·
Ages 7–8 Fluency,
Data Thinking & Collaborative Inquiry |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 70–90 words per minute with comprehension |
|
☐ |
Identifies
main idea, cause and effect, and author's purpose in nonfiction |
|
☐ |
Writes
organized opinion, narrative, and informational paragraphs (3 paragraphs) |
|
☐ |
Uses
transition words correctly in writing |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 1,000 with regrouping (using CPA sequence) |
|
☐ |
Understands
multiplication as repeated addition and equal groups |
|
☐ |
Creates,
reads, and analyzes bar graphs and picture graphs |
|
☐ |
Measures in
inches and centimeters; understands perimeter |
|
☐ |
Tells time
to the nearest 5 minutes |
|
☐ |
Investigates
ecosystems and interdependence through hands-on labs |
|
☐ |
Identifies
human impacts on ecosystems |
|
☐ |
Applies map
skills: cardinal directions, map key, scale |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates an
empathy map for a character or real person |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a restorative circle for community repair when needed |
|
☐ |
Shares a
family/cultural story or tradition with the class |
|
☐ |
Uses 'I need
help with…' and 'I am proud of…' language authentically |
|
☐ |
Identifies
and appreciates another person's unique strength |
|
☐ |
Uses humor
appropriately as a learning and connection tool |
|
☐ |
Advocates
for a peer who is being left out |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Plans a
multi-step project using a graphic organizer |
|
☐ |
Begins using
a rubric to self-assess work before submitting |
|
☐ |
Uses
chunking to manage a longer text or multi-part problem |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
flexible thinking: identifies a second strategy when stuck |
|
☐ |
Sets and
tracks a weekly academic goal |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Completes
Design Thinking DEFINE stage: writes a problem statement from interview data |
|
☐ |
Designs a
class survey, collects data, displays results, and draws a conclusion |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a 'How Might We' challenge for a school improvement problem |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
cause-and-effect chains in a real-world situation |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Completes
Kagan Jigsaw: becomes an expert and teaches the group |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Socratic Seminar using accountable talk sentence stems |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to and honors a team contract for group work |
|
☐ |
Gives one
specific 'warm' comment and one 'cool' question to a peer's work |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
Scratch project with sequences, events, and loops |
|
☐ |
Compares a
vague prompt vs. a specific prompt and evaluates the AI's response |
|
☐ |
Uses an AI
tool (teacher-guided) to research a topic; evaluates one answer for accuracy |
|
☐ |
Identifies
one way AI might not be fair or accurate (introduction to bias) |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
3 ·
Ages 8–9 Deep
Reading, Multiplication & Design Thinking |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 90–110 words per minute with analysis of theme |
|
☐ |
Identifies
author's craft: word choice, structure, point of view |
|
☐ |
Writes a
structured research report using 2+ sources with citations |
|
☐ |
Writes a
persuasive paragraph with a clear claim and two pieces of evidence |
|
☐ |
Multiplies
and divides within 100 fluently (facts 0–10) |
|
☐ |
Understands
fractions as parts of a whole; places fractions on a number line |
|
☐ |
Calculates
area and perimeter of rectangles |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
simple science experiment and writes a basic lab report |
|
☐ |
Analyzes a
primary source document with teacher support |
|
☐ |
Identifies
local history events and their significance |
|
☐ |
Represents
and solves word problems using bar models |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Develops a
nuanced emotional vocabulary (frustrated vs. overwhelmed vs. anxious) |
|
☐ |
Reads with a
Kindergarten buddy weekly (cross-age mentoring begins) |
|
☐ |
Uses peer
mediation scripts to help resolve a peer conflict |
|
☐ |
Dedicates
Genius Hour (30 min/week) to a personal passion inquiry |
|
☐ |
Documents a
failure and what was learned from it |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a cultural appreciation project (storytelling traditions) |
|
☐ |
Gives a
genuine compliment to each team member after a project |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
project plan with milestone deadlines for a 2-week assignment |
|
☐ |
Takes
Cornell or sketch notes independently |
|
☐ |
Prioritizes
tasks: identifies what is most important vs. can wait |
|
☐ |
Sets one
weekly academic goal and one personal growth goal |
|
☐ |
Monitors own
comprehension: knows when to reread vs. when to continue |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Completes a
full Design Thinking cycle (Empathize–Define–Ideate–Prototype–Test) on a
school problem |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Odyssey of the Mind: receives and begins working on a long-term problem |
|
☐ |
Draws a
cause-and-effect chain with at least 3 links |
|
☐ |
Uses an
iceberg model to identify visible vs. hidden causes of a problem |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a
Harkness Seminar discussion segment (teacher observes, does not lead) |
|
☐ |
Uses
Team-Pair-Solo Kagan structure: group → pair → independent mastery |
|
☐ |
Gives 'warm,
cool, wonder' written feedback to a peer's writing |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a weekly spontaneous problem with a team of 3–4 |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Uses RCFC
prompt framework: Role, Context, Format, Constraints |
|
☐ |
Creates a
Scratch branching story with if-then conditional logic |
|
☐ |
Collaborates
with AI on a writing task: evaluates AI draft, revises, combines |
|
☐ |
Explains in
own words what data AI learns from and one way that could be unfair |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
4 ·
Ages 9–10 Analytical
Thinking, Systems & Team Leadership |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Analyzes
point of view and author's purpose across multiple texts |
|
☐ |
Compares and
contrasts two informational texts on the same topic |
|
☐ |
Writes a
multi-source research essay with an introduction, body, and conclusion |
|
☐ |
Writes a
structured literary analysis paragraph |
|
☐ |
Multiplies
multi-digit numbers fluently (up to 4-digit x 1-digit; 2-digit x 2-digit) |
|
☐ |
Divides with
remainders; interprets remainders in context |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts fractions with like denominators |
|
☐ |
Converts
between fractions and decimals (tenths, hundredths) |
|
☐ |
Classifies
angles (acute, right, obtuse, straight) and geometric shapes |
|
☐ |
Designs and
conducts a controlled experiment identifying variables |
|
☐ |
Analyzes a
primary source: identifies perspective and purpose |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Serves as
rotating Project Manager for all team tasks |
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal values statement |
|
☐ |
Connects
with a partner from a different cultural background on a shared project |
|
☐ |
Tracks own
learning growth over a marking period in a portfolio |
|
☐ |
Designs a
class service learning project that addresses a community need |
|
☐ |
Formally
mentors a Grade 2 student in a reading buddy program |
|
☐ |
Leads a
class morning meeting or circle |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Builds a
personal project timeline using a Gantt-style planner |
|
☐ |
Writes a
weekly thinking journal entry: strategy used, why, what to try next |
|
☐ |
Identifies
when cognitive load is high and applies a chunking strategy |
|
☐ |
Uses a
pre-mortem: lists three things that could go wrong before starting |
|
☐ |
Balances
multiple assignments using a priority list |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a team
through a wicked problem design challenge (real community need) |
|
☐ |
Applies
SCAMPER brainstorming to generate 10+ ideas |
|
☐ |
Performs a
pre-mortem analysis on a team challenge plan |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Odyssey of the Mind competition (long-term + spontaneous) |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads
Complex Instruction Kagan structure: assigns roles, monitors interdependence |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Socratic Seminar on a social issue using accountable talk |
|
☐ |
Identifies
which Tuckman stage their team is in and describes why |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
a team retrospective: What worked? What didn't? What do we commit to? |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Designs a
multi-part AI prompt using RCFC with iteration (at least 3 revisions) |
|
☐ |
Writes and
runs a Python script using variables and a loop (e.g., times table generator) |
|
☐ |
Uses AI to
research a topic and synthesizes 3 sources into a written summary |
|
☐ |
Presents an
AI ethics case study to the class: who benefits, who might be harmed |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
5 ·
Ages 10–11 Research,
Reasoning & Collaborative Expertise |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Analyzes
theme, symbolism, and author's craft in literary texts |
|
☐ |
Evaluates an
author's argument: identifies claim, evidence, and reasoning |
|
☐ |
Writes a
5-paragraph research essay with citations from 3+ sources |
|
☐ |
Writes a
formal literary analysis essay |
|
☐ |
Adds,
subtracts, multiplies, and divides fractions and mixed numbers |
|
☐ |
Performs all
four operations with decimals |
|
☐ |
Introduces
ratios and proportional relationships |
|
☐ |
Applies
order of operations and writes/evaluates expressions with variables |
|
☐ |
Designs an
experiment with a hypothesis, controlled variables, and data table |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
primary sources from American history (1600–1800) |
|
☐ |
Reads and
creates data displays: line graphs, histograms, scatter plots (intro) |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Writes a
personal mission statement |
|
☐ |
Engages in
civil dialogue across a difference in perspective |
|
☐ |
Presents a
community need to school leadership (advocacy project) |
|
☐ |
Formally
tutors Grades 2–3 students in reading (peer mentor role) |
|
☐ |
Maintains a
weekly gratitude reflection journal |
|
☐ |
Practices
genuine listening without planning a response |
|
☐ |
Names three
of their own values and provides evidence of living them |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Independently
manages a 6-week research project from question to presentation |
|
☐ |
Uses a
digital planner to manage 3+ concurrent assignments |
|
☐ |
Scores own
work against a rubric with accurate evidence before submitting |
|
☐ |
Applies deep
work strategies: timed focus blocks, removes distractions |
|
☐ |
Distinguishes
between urgent/important tasks using a priority matrix |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies a
systems thinking feedback loop to a real environmental or social issue |
|
☐ |
Uses
claim-evidence-warrant structure in all spoken and written arguments |
|
☐ |
Leads the
spontaneous problem team in Odyssey of the Mind |
|
☐ |
Updates a
belief when presented with new evidence (Bayesian thinking intro) |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Designs
discussion questions for and facilitates a full Harkness Seminar |
|
☐ |
Teaches a
math concept to a group using concrete materials (peer expert) |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
a conflict resolution between two team members |
|
☐ |
Leads a team
retrospective using formal 'What? So What? Now What?' protocol |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Conducts a
multi-turn AI conversation with context management and iteration |
|
☐ |
Writes
Python functions and uses conditionals to solve a real problem |
|
☐ |
Acts as
editor of an AI-generated draft: evaluates, revises, and improves |
|
☐ |
Creates a
data visualization from a class-collected dataset using Python |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
6–8 (Middle School) · Ages 11–14 Critical
Analysis, Team Mastery & Real-World Application |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Grade 6:
Ratios, rates, negative numbers, algebraic expressions, geometry |
|
☐ |
Grade 7:
Proportional relationships, linear equations, probability, statistics |
|
☐ |
Grade 8 /
Algebra 1: Linear functions, systems of equations, quadratics introduction |
|
☐ |
ELA:
Rhetorical analysis, multi-source synthesis argument essays (5+ sources) |
|
☐ |
Science:
Inquiry labs with student-designed experimental designs and reports |
|
☐ |
World
History: Primary source analysis and comparative historiography |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
AP-readiness in at least one content area by Grade 8 |
|
☐ |
Speaks a
world language at conversational level (B1 emerging) |
|
☐ |
Completes a
semester-long independent research project and public presentation |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Completes a
strengths inventory and articulates a personal leadership style |
|
☐ |
Participates
in cross-cultural video exchange or pen pal project |
|
☐ |
Designs and
executes a student-led community impact project (semesterly) |
|
☐ |
Formally
mentors a Grade 6 student as a Grade 8 peer leader |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
psychological safety behaviors in team settings |
|
☐ |
Applies
ethical reasoning to a technology or environmental dilemma |
|
☐ |
Reflects on
personal identity development in a portfolio essay |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Authors a
semester personal learning plan with quarterly reviews |
|
☐ |
Manages a
personal knowledge management (PKM) system for research |
|
☐ |
Applies
cognitive flexibility: transfers a concept to an unfamiliar context |
|
☐ |
Schedules
deep work blocks and protects them from distraction |
|
☐ |
Completes a
semester-long independent research project on schedule |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies
causal loop diagrams and iceberg models to analyze a complex issue |
|
☐ |
Writes a
3-futures scenario analysis (optimistic, pessimistic, transform) on a real
issue |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Structured Academic Controversy: argues both sides, then synthesizes |
|
☐ |
Applies
basic game theory to a strategic team decision |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Runs a fully
student-led Harkness Seminar with peer process reflection |
|
☐ |
Serves as
Project Manager for a cross-grade team challenge |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
dialectical dialogue: leads a structured two-sides debate to synthesis |
|
☐ |
Coaches a
peer through a challenge using active listening and questions |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Writes
system prompts and uses chain-of-thought and few-shot prompting techniques |
|
☐ |
Completes a
Python data analysis project using pandas and matplotlib |
|
☐ |
Builds a
functional web page (HTML/CSS/JavaScript) as a personal portfolio |
|
☐ |
Analyzes an
AI bias case study and writes a student policy proposal |
|
☐ |
Uses an
agentic AI tool for a multi-step task and evaluates quality of output |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
9–10 (Early High School) · Ages 14–16 Strategic
Thinking, Synthesis & Emerging Voice |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Writes
AP-level literary analysis and rhetorical analysis essays |
|
☐ |
Synthesizes
5+ sources into an original research argument |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
mastery in Algebra 2 or Geometry |
|
☐ |
Applies
statistics to real-world datasets (mean, median, standard deviation,
distributions) |
|
☐ |
Designs and
conducts an independent science investigation with full write-up |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
global historical events using multiple historiographical perspectives |
|
☐ |
Achieves
conversational fluency in a world language (B1–B2) |
|
☐ |
Reads and
responds to college-level nonfiction texts |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Builds trust
within a team using explicit trust-building frameworks |
|
☐ |
Leads a
schoolwide or cross-grade project as primary coordinator |
|
☐ |
Participates
in local government or issue advocacy campaign |
|
☐ |
Applies
ethical reasoning to AI, environmental, and social justice dilemmas |
|
☐ |
Begins a
3-year senior passion project with documented vision |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
psychological safety: models vulnerability in team settings |
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal ethics framework in writing |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Authors a
personal learning plan with semester goals and quarterly evidence |
|
☐ |
Applies
calendar blocking for academic deep work and life balance |
|
☐ |
Navigates
ambiguity: thrives in a challenge without a clear correct answer |
|
☐ |
Manages
multiple concurrent long-term projects without teacher prompting |
|
☐ |
Identifies
and applies a personal cognitive flexibility strategy |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Conducts a
STEEP analysis (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political) on
a real issue |
|
☐ |
Applies
multi-criteria decision matrix to a significant personal or team choice |
|
☐ |
Argues both
sides of a complex issue with equal rigor (red team/blue team) |
|
☐ |
Writes a
competitive strategy analysis for an entrepreneurship project |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a
boardroom-style strategy presentation with stakeholder Q&A |
|
☐ |
Coordinates
across multiple sub-teams on a complex project |
|
☐ |
Designs and
facilitates a student-authored Harkness curriculum unit |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
formal coaching conversation with a peer using coaching frameworks |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Uses
few-shot, chain-of-thought, and meta-prompting techniques fluently |
|
☐ |
Builds and
deploys a functional app using an AI API (e.g., Anthropic, OpenAI) |
|
☐ |
Writes and
documents a Python automation script for a real-world task |
|
☐ |
Authors an
AI ethics framework for a chosen domain (health, education, justice) |
|
☐ |
Documents a
portfolio of AI-augmented work with human annotation |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
11–12 (Senior High School) · Ages 16–18 Mastery,
Leadership & Contribution to the World |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Publishes
original research at AP or dual-enrollment college level |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
mastery in chosen academic pathway (STEM, Humanities, Arts, Design) |
|
☐ |
Applies
statistics and data science: models, validation, interpretation |
|
☐ |
Writes a
grant proposal, policy memo, or academic paper for a real audience |
|
☐ |
Achieves B2+
fluency in a world language |
|
☐ |
Applies
philosophical frameworks (ethics, epistemology, logic) to real decisions |
|
☐ |
Completes
Senior Capstone: 2-year passion project culminating in public presentation |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal mission statement and 10-year vision |
|
☐ |
Completes an
immersive empathy experience with an underrepresented community |
|
☐ |
Leads with
vulnerability and courage: models authentic leadership for peers |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
Emotional Intelligence 2.0: self-awareness, empathy, influence, conflict
mastery |
|
☐ |
Designs an
ohana legacy: what do I leave behind for those who come after? |
|
☐ |
Maintains a
reflective practice journal across the senior year |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
executive presence: communicates with clarity, conviction, composure |
|
☐ |
Applies
habit architecture to build a sustainable learning system |
|
☐ |
Navigates
setback and failure using a post-mortem framework |
|
☐ |
Practices
strategic patience: pursues long-horizon goals without constant reinforcement |
|
☐ |
Authors and
executes a personal 3-year strategic plan |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies blue
ocean thinking to identify an uncontested value opportunity |
|
☐ |
Identifies
leverage points in a complex system and designs an intervention |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
McKinsey-style MECE problem decomposition on a real challenge |
|
☐ |
Presents a
hypothesis-driven analysis to a real external audience |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Founds or
leads a student organization, startup, or nonprofit |
|
☐ |
Manages a
cross-sector partnership (school + business/NGO/government) |
|
☐ |
Co-teaches a
curriculum unit in a lower grade as a guest expert |
|
☐ |
Delivers a
TED-style Capstone presentation to a community + peer audience |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Ships a
functional AI-augmented product or tool to real users |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
LLM literacy: explains how large language models work and fail |
|
☐ |
Orchestrates
an agentic AI workflow for a complex multi-step real-world task |
|
☐ |
Submits an
AI governance policy proposal to a real organization |
|
☐ |
Presents a
portfolio of AI-augmented work with critical reflection and evidence |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
INDIVIDUELL UTVECKLINGSPLAN Individual Development Plan ·
IUP Classroom of the Future A Skills & Knowledge Checklist for
Every Child, Preschool through Grade 12 Inspired by the Swedish Individuell
Utvecklingsplan (IUP) · Established 2006 A mandatory, living document — reviewed
each marking period by teacher, student, and parent together. |
|
☐ Emerging |
☐ Pass (50%+ Mastery) |
★ High Pass (75%+ Mastery) |
|
Building
foundations. Skills present with support. Not yet demonstrating consistent
independent application. |
Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates meaningfully. Occasional guidance
needed. |
Applies,
transfers, teaches, and extends learning. Leads. Produces original thinking.
Connects across domains. |
|
HOW TO USE THIS IUP 1. Before the conference — Teacher completes a
draft based on observation and portfolio evidence. 2. During the three-way conference — Student,
teacher, and parent review each skill together. Check each item: Emerging,
Pass, or High Pass. 3. Narrative sections — Fill in
collaboratively, centering the student's voice. 4. Sign and date — All three parties commit to
the goals and the support plan. 5. Next conference — Pull out this IUP. Review
growth. Update. Celebrate. |
|
π Academic |
π€ Human Skills |
π§ Executive
Function |
♟️ Strategic Thinking |
π₯ Collaborative |
π€ AI & Tech |
Grade-level IUPs follow on the next pages — one per grade
level, Preschool through Grade 12.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Preschool ·
Ages 3–5 Wonder,
Play & Foundation |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Recognizes
and produces 20+ of the 44 English phonemes |
|
☐ |
Identifies
letters by name (uppercase and lowercase A–Z) |
|
☐ |
Counts
objects 1–10 with one-to-one correspondence |
|
☐ |
Recognizes
basic shapes: circle, square, triangle, rectangle |
|
☐ |
Identifies
primary and secondary colors |
|
☐ |
Extends
simple AB, AAB, and ABB patterns |
|
☐ |
Retells a
simple story with a beginning, middle, and end |
|
☐ |
Draws
pictures to represent ideas; attempts mark-making for writing |
|
☐ |
Asks and
answers questions about a text read aloud |
|
☐ |
Sorts and
classifies objects by color, shape, or size |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
curiosity through observation and questioning |
|
☐ |
Makes
predictions using prior knowledge |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Names and
identifies basic emotions (happy, sad, angry, scared, surprised) |
|
☐ |
Uses words
instead of actions when upset (emerging self-regulation) |
|
☐ |
Takes turns
and shares materials with peers |
|
☐ |
Greets
classmates and adults with respect |
|
☐ |
Participates
in group routines and circle time |
|
☐ |
Shows care
and kindness toward a peer in need |
|
☐ |
Follows
classroom ohana (community) agreements with support |
|
☐ |
Engages in
cooperative dramatic play, taking on a role |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Follows a
2-step direction consistently |
|
☐ |
Stays
focused on a chosen task for 5–10 minutes |
|
☐ |
Transitions
between activities using a visual schedule |
|
☐ |
Waits for a
turn (impulse control emerging) |
|
☐ |
Tidies own
workspace when done |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Tries more
than one approach when a first attempt fails |
|
☐ |
Participates
in 'What would happen if…' exploration |
|
☐ |
Builds with
blocks or materials with a visible intention |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a simple verbal problem posed by teacher |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Works
alongside a partner on a shared project |
|
☐ |
Listens when
a peer is speaking (body, eyes, brain ready) |
|
☐ |
Contributes
one idea during a group discussion |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a group art or building project |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Understands
that computers follow instructions (cause-and-effect thinking) |
|
☐ |
Listens to
an AI-narrated story and asks a question about it |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
kind and respectful language use on digital tools |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Kindergarten ·
Ages 5–6 Phonics,
Curiosity & Team Belonging |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Decodes CVC
(consonant-vowel-consonant) words correctly |
|
☐ |
Reads 30+
Dolch sight words fluently |
|
☐ |
Reads simple
decodable texts with expression |
|
☐ |
Writes 2–3
complete sentences with spaces between words |
|
☐ |
Uses capital
letters and end punctuation |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 10 using objects, fingers, and drawings |
|
☐ |
Understands
place value: tens and ones with base-ten blocks |
|
☐ |
Identifies
coins and their values |
|
☐ |
Describes
the life cycle of a plant or animal |
|
☐ |
Asks
testable questions and records observations |
|
☐ |
Explains the
roles of family and community helpers |
|
☐ |
Compares and
orders objects by length and weight |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Identifies
and labels a full range of emotions in self and others |
|
☐ |
Uses 'I
feel…because…' sentence frames to express emotions |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to building the class ohana (community) agreements |
|
☐ |
Resolves
minor conflicts using a peace corner or 'I' statement |
|
☐ |
Celebrates
differences: identifies one way they are unique, one way they are like a
classmate |
|
☐ |
Cares for
classroom materials and shared spaces |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
growth mindset language ('I can't do it yet') |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Sustains
focused attention on a task for 10–15 minutes |
|
☐ |
Uses a
personal checklist to track daily tasks |
|
☐ |
Organizes
personal materials in a designated space |
|
☐ |
Asks for
help when needed rather than giving up |
|
☐ |
Recognizes
when work is complete vs. incomplete |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Uses the
3-step problem frame: What do I know? What do I need? What can I try? |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a weekly verbal spontaneous problem (timed, oral response) |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a partner design challenge (build with 20 blocks) |
|
☐ |
Names at
least two different strategies for solving a math problem |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Participates
in Think-Pair-Share with a consistent partner |
|
☐ |
Takes the
role of Reader or Questioner in partner reading |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to a group mural or collaborative art project |
|
☐ |
Listens
without interrupting during partner sharing |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Understands
that a computer needs clear, specific instructions |
|
☐ |
Evaluates an
AI-read-aloud answer: 'Did it get that right?' |
|
☐ |
Identifies
private information that should not be shared online |
|
☐ |
Participates
in an unplugged algorithm sequencing activity |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
1 ·
Ages 6–7 Decoding,
Number Sense & Peer Learning |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 40–60 words per minute with comprehension |
|
☐ |
Decodes
words with digraphs (ch, sh, th), blends, and long vowel patterns |
|
☐ |
Identifies
main idea and 2–3 supporting details in a text |
|
☐ |
Writes a
paragraph with a topic sentence and 2–3 supporting sentences |
|
☐ |
Uses capital
letters, commas, and end punctuation correctly |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 100 using concrete and pictorial strategies |
|
☐ |
Understands
place value: hundreds, tens, ones |
|
☐ |
Measures
length using non-standard and standard units (cm, inches) |
|
☐ |
Tells time
to the hour and half-hour |
|
☐ |
Reads and
creates bar graphs and picture graphs |
|
☐ |
Observes and
describes animal life cycles |
|
☐ |
Identifies
physical properties of materials (solid, liquid, gas) |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Identifies
personal strengths and records one in a weekly strength journal |
|
☐ |
Listens with
full body, brain, and heart (active listening protocol) |
|
☐ |
Honors
different learning styles: my way is not the only way |
|
☐ |
Practices a
3-minute mindfulness/breathing routine daily |
|
☐ |
Encourages a
peer using specific, genuine praise |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
perseverance after a first failed attempt |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a class job that serves the community |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Breaks a 2–3
step task into parts independently |
|
☐ |
Uses a
personal daily agenda or task checklist |
|
☐ |
Identifies a
frustration trigger and names it before acting |
|
☐ |
Estimates
how long a task will take and checks accuracy |
|
☐ |
Stays on
task with one reminder or none |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Participates
in a monthly team design challenge (Odyssey of the Mind style) |
|
☐ |
Contributes
a verbal response to a weekly spontaneous problem (timed) |
|
☐ |
Begins the
Design Thinking EMPATHIZE stage: interviews a classmate about a problem |
|
☐ |
Explains a
math solution using more than one strategy |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Uses Kagan
Rally Robin and Numbered Heads Together structures |
|
☐ |
Serves as
peer tutor in math using concrete materials |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Harkness-lite small group discussion |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to a group discussion talking map (tracks who has spoken) |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
simple sequence in Scratch Jr (3+ blocks with a clear outcome) |
|
☐ |
Distinguishes
between a vague and specific computer instruction |
|
☐ |
Evaluates
one AI-generated answer for accuracy with teacher support |
|
☐ |
Completes an
unplugged coding sequence activity (algorithm cards) |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
2 ·
Ages 7–8 Fluency,
Data Thinking & Collaborative Inquiry |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 70–90 words per minute with comprehension |
|
☐ |
Identifies
main idea, cause and effect, and author's purpose in nonfiction |
|
☐ |
Writes
organized opinion, narrative, and informational paragraphs (3 paragraphs) |
|
☐ |
Uses
transition words correctly in writing |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts within 1,000 with regrouping (using CPA sequence) |
|
☐ |
Understands
multiplication as repeated addition and equal groups |
|
☐ |
Creates,
reads, and analyzes bar graphs and picture graphs |
|
☐ |
Measures in
inches and centimeters; understands perimeter |
|
☐ |
Tells time
to the nearest 5 minutes |
|
☐ |
Investigates
ecosystems and interdependence through hands-on labs |
|
☐ |
Identifies
human impacts on ecosystems |
|
☐ |
Applies map
skills: cardinal directions, map key, scale |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates an
empathy map for a character or real person |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a restorative circle for community repair when needed |
|
☐ |
Shares a
family/cultural story or tradition with the class |
|
☐ |
Uses 'I need
help with…' and 'I am proud of…' language authentically |
|
☐ |
Identifies
and appreciates another person's unique strength |
|
☐ |
Uses humor
appropriately as a learning and connection tool |
|
☐ |
Advocates
for a peer who is being left out |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Plans a
multi-step project using a graphic organizer |
|
☐ |
Begins using
a rubric to self-assess work before submitting |
|
☐ |
Uses
chunking to manage a longer text or multi-part problem |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
flexible thinking: identifies a second strategy when stuck |
|
☐ |
Sets and
tracks a weekly academic goal |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Completes
Design Thinking DEFINE stage: writes a problem statement from interview data |
|
☐ |
Designs a
class survey, collects data, displays results, and draws a conclusion |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a 'How Might We' challenge for a school improvement problem |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
cause-and-effect chains in a real-world situation |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Completes
Kagan Jigsaw: becomes an expert and teaches the group |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Socratic Seminar using accountable talk sentence stems |
|
☐ |
Contributes
to and honors a team contract for group work |
|
☐ |
Gives one
specific 'warm' comment and one 'cool' question to a peer's work |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
Scratch project with sequences, events, and loops |
|
☐ |
Compares a
vague prompt vs. a specific prompt and evaluates the AI's response |
|
☐ |
Uses an AI
tool (teacher-guided) to research a topic; evaluates one answer for accuracy |
|
☐ |
Identifies
one way AI might not be fair or accurate (introduction to bias) |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
3 ·
Ages 8–9 Deep
Reading, Multiplication & Design Thinking |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Reads
grade-level texts at 90–110 words per minute with analysis of theme |
|
☐ |
Identifies
author's craft: word choice, structure, point of view |
|
☐ |
Writes a
structured research report using 2+ sources with citations |
|
☐ |
Writes a
persuasive paragraph with a clear claim and two pieces of evidence |
|
☐ |
Multiplies
and divides within 100 fluently (facts 0–10) |
|
☐ |
Understands
fractions as parts of a whole; places fractions on a number line |
|
☐ |
Calculates
area and perimeter of rectangles |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
simple science experiment and writes a basic lab report |
|
☐ |
Analyzes a
primary source document with teacher support |
|
☐ |
Identifies
local history events and their significance |
|
☐ |
Represents
and solves word problems using bar models |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Develops a
nuanced emotional vocabulary (frustrated vs. overwhelmed vs. anxious) |
|
☐ |
Reads with a
Kindergarten buddy weekly (cross-age mentoring begins) |
|
☐ |
Uses peer
mediation scripts to help resolve a peer conflict |
|
☐ |
Dedicates
Genius Hour (30 min/week) to a personal passion inquiry |
|
☐ |
Documents a
failure and what was learned from it |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a cultural appreciation project (storytelling traditions) |
|
☐ |
Gives a
genuine compliment to each team member after a project |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Creates a
project plan with milestone deadlines for a 2-week assignment |
|
☐ |
Takes
Cornell or sketch notes independently |
|
☐ |
Prioritizes
tasks: identifies what is most important vs. can wait |
|
☐ |
Sets one
weekly academic goal and one personal growth goal |
|
☐ |
Monitors own
comprehension: knows when to reread vs. when to continue |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Completes a
full Design Thinking cycle (Empathize–Define–Ideate–Prototype–Test) on a
school problem |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Odyssey of the Mind: receives and begins working on a long-term problem |
|
☐ |
Draws a
cause-and-effect chain with at least 3 links |
|
☐ |
Uses an
iceberg model to identify visible vs. hidden causes of a problem |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a
Harkness Seminar discussion segment (teacher observes, does not lead) |
|
☐ |
Uses
Team-Pair-Solo Kagan structure: group → pair → independent mastery |
|
☐ |
Gives 'warm,
cool, wonder' written feedback to a peer's writing |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a weekly spontaneous problem with a team of 3–4 |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Uses RCFC
prompt framework: Role, Context, Format, Constraints |
|
☐ |
Creates a
Scratch branching story with if-then conditional logic |
|
☐ |
Collaborates
with AI on a writing task: evaluates AI draft, revises, combines |
|
☐ |
Explains in
own words what data AI learns from and one way that could be unfair |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
4 ·
Ages 9–10 Analytical
Thinking, Systems & Team Leadership |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Analyzes
point of view and author's purpose across multiple texts |
|
☐ |
Compares and
contrasts two informational texts on the same topic |
|
☐ |
Writes a
multi-source research essay with an introduction, body, and conclusion |
|
☐ |
Writes a
structured literary analysis paragraph |
|
☐ |
Multiplies
multi-digit numbers fluently (up to 4-digit x 1-digit; 2-digit x 2-digit) |
|
☐ |
Divides with
remainders; interprets remainders in context |
|
☐ |
Adds and
subtracts fractions with like denominators |
|
☐ |
Converts
between fractions and decimals (tenths, hundredths) |
|
☐ |
Classifies
angles (acute, right, obtuse, straight) and geometric shapes |
|
☐ |
Designs and
conducts a controlled experiment identifying variables |
|
☐ |
Analyzes a
primary source: identifies perspective and purpose |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Serves as
rotating Project Manager for all team tasks |
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal values statement |
|
☐ |
Connects
with a partner from a different cultural background on a shared project |
|
☐ |
Tracks own
learning growth over a marking period in a portfolio |
|
☐ |
Designs a
class service learning project that addresses a community need |
|
☐ |
Formally
mentors a Grade 2 student in a reading buddy program |
|
☐ |
Leads a
class morning meeting or circle |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Builds a
personal project timeline using a Gantt-style planner |
|
☐ |
Writes a
weekly thinking journal entry: strategy used, why, what to try next |
|
☐ |
Identifies
when cognitive load is high and applies a chunking strategy |
|
☐ |
Uses a
pre-mortem: lists three things that could go wrong before starting |
|
☐ |
Balances
multiple assignments using a priority list |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a team
through a wicked problem design challenge (real community need) |
|
☐ |
Applies
SCAMPER brainstorming to generate 10+ ideas |
|
☐ |
Performs a
pre-mortem analysis on a team challenge plan |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Odyssey of the Mind competition (long-term + spontaneous) |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads
Complex Instruction Kagan structure: assigns roles, monitors interdependence |
|
☐ |
Participates
in a Socratic Seminar on a social issue using accountable talk |
|
☐ |
Identifies
which Tuckman stage their team is in and describes why |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
a team retrospective: What worked? What didn't? What do we commit to? |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Designs a
multi-part AI prompt using RCFC with iteration (at least 3 revisions) |
|
☐ |
Writes and
runs a Python script using variables and a loop (e.g., times table generator) |
|
☐ |
Uses AI to
research a topic and synthesizes 3 sources into a written summary |
|
☐ |
Presents an
AI ethics case study to the class: who benefits, who might be harmed |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grade
5 ·
Ages 10–11 Research,
Reasoning & Collaborative Expertise |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Analyzes
theme, symbolism, and author's craft in literary texts |
|
☐ |
Evaluates an
author's argument: identifies claim, evidence, and reasoning |
|
☐ |
Writes a
5-paragraph research essay with citations from 3+ sources |
|
☐ |
Writes a
formal literary analysis essay |
|
☐ |
Adds,
subtracts, multiplies, and divides fractions and mixed numbers |
|
☐ |
Performs all
four operations with decimals |
|
☐ |
Introduces
ratios and proportional relationships |
|
☐ |
Applies
order of operations and writes/evaluates expressions with variables |
|
☐ |
Designs an
experiment with a hypothesis, controlled variables, and data table |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
primary sources from American history (1600–1800) |
|
☐ |
Reads and
creates data displays: line graphs, histograms, scatter plots (intro) |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Writes a
personal mission statement |
|
☐ |
Engages in
civil dialogue across a difference in perspective |
|
☐ |
Presents a
community need to school leadership (advocacy project) |
|
☐ |
Formally
tutors Grades 2–3 students in reading (peer mentor role) |
|
☐ |
Maintains a
weekly gratitude reflection journal |
|
☐ |
Practices
genuine listening without planning a response |
|
☐ |
Names three
of their own values and provides evidence of living them |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Independently
manages a 6-week research project from question to presentation |
|
☐ |
Uses a
digital planner to manage 3+ concurrent assignments |
|
☐ |
Scores own
work against a rubric with accurate evidence before submitting |
|
☐ |
Applies deep
work strategies: timed focus blocks, removes distractions |
|
☐ |
Distinguishes
between urgent/important tasks using a priority matrix |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies a
systems thinking feedback loop to a real environmental or social issue |
|
☐ |
Uses
claim-evidence-warrant structure in all spoken and written arguments |
|
☐ |
Leads the
spontaneous problem team in Odyssey of the Mind |
|
☐ |
Updates a
belief when presented with new evidence (Bayesian thinking intro) |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Designs
discussion questions for and facilitates a full Harkness Seminar |
|
☐ |
Teaches a
math concept to a group using concrete materials (peer expert) |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
a conflict resolution between two team members |
|
☐ |
Leads a team
retrospective using formal 'What? So What? Now What?' protocol |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Conducts a
multi-turn AI conversation with context management and iteration |
|
☐ |
Writes
Python functions and uses conditionals to solve a real problem |
|
☐ |
Acts as
editor of an AI-generated draft: evaluates, revises, and improves |
|
☐ |
Creates a
data visualization from a class-collected dataset using Python |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
6–8 (Middle School) · Ages 11–14 Critical
Analysis, Team Mastery & Real-World Application |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Grade 6:
Ratios, rates, negative numbers, algebraic expressions, geometry |
|
☐ |
Grade 7:
Proportional relationships, linear equations, probability, statistics |
|
☐ |
Grade 8 /
Algebra 1: Linear functions, systems of equations, quadratics introduction |
|
☐ |
ELA:
Rhetorical analysis, multi-source synthesis argument essays (5+ sources) |
|
☐ |
Science:
Inquiry labs with student-designed experimental designs and reports |
|
☐ |
World
History: Primary source analysis and comparative historiography |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
AP-readiness in at least one content area by Grade 8 |
|
☐ |
Speaks a
world language at conversational level (B1 emerging) |
|
☐ |
Completes a
semester-long independent research project and public presentation |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Completes a
strengths inventory and articulates a personal leadership style |
|
☐ |
Participates
in cross-cultural video exchange or pen pal project |
|
☐ |
Designs and
executes a student-led community impact project (semesterly) |
|
☐ |
Formally
mentors a Grade 6 student as a Grade 8 peer leader |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
psychological safety behaviors in team settings |
|
☐ |
Applies
ethical reasoning to a technology or environmental dilemma |
|
☐ |
Reflects on
personal identity development in a portfolio essay |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Authors a
semester personal learning plan with quarterly reviews |
|
☐ |
Manages a
personal knowledge management (PKM) system for research |
|
☐ |
Applies
cognitive flexibility: transfers a concept to an unfamiliar context |
|
☐ |
Schedules
deep work blocks and protects them from distraction |
|
☐ |
Completes a
semester-long independent research project on schedule |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies
causal loop diagrams and iceberg models to analyze a complex issue |
|
☐ |
Writes a
3-futures scenario analysis (optimistic, pessimistic, transform) on a real
issue |
|
☐ |
Participates
in Structured Academic Controversy: argues both sides, then synthesizes |
|
☐ |
Applies
basic game theory to a strategic team decision |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Runs a fully
student-led Harkness Seminar with peer process reflection |
|
☐ |
Serves as
Project Manager for a cross-grade team challenge |
|
☐ |
Facilitates
dialectical dialogue: leads a structured two-sides debate to synthesis |
|
☐ |
Coaches a
peer through a challenge using active listening and questions |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Writes
system prompts and uses chain-of-thought and few-shot prompting techniques |
|
☐ |
Completes a
Python data analysis project using pandas and matplotlib |
|
☐ |
Builds a
functional web page (HTML/CSS/JavaScript) as a personal portfolio |
|
☐ |
Analyzes an
AI bias case study and writes a student policy proposal |
|
☐ |
Uses an
agentic AI tool for a multi-step task and evaluates quality of output |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
9–10 (Early High School) · Ages 14–16 Strategic
Thinking, Synthesis & Emerging Voice |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Writes
AP-level literary analysis and rhetorical analysis essays |
|
☐ |
Synthesizes
5+ sources into an original research argument |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
mastery in Algebra 2 or Geometry |
|
☐ |
Applies
statistics to real-world datasets (mean, median, standard deviation,
distributions) |
|
☐ |
Designs and
conducts an independent science investigation with full write-up |
|
☐ |
Analyzes
global historical events using multiple historiographical perspectives |
|
☐ |
Achieves
conversational fluency in a world language (B1–B2) |
|
☐ |
Reads and
responds to college-level nonfiction texts |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Builds trust
within a team using explicit trust-building frameworks |
|
☐ |
Leads a
schoolwide or cross-grade project as primary coordinator |
|
☐ |
Participates
in local government or issue advocacy campaign |
|
☐ |
Applies
ethical reasoning to AI, environmental, and social justice dilemmas |
|
☐ |
Begins a
3-year senior passion project with documented vision |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
psychological safety: models vulnerability in team settings |
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal ethics framework in writing |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Authors a
personal learning plan with semester goals and quarterly evidence |
|
☐ |
Applies
calendar blocking for academic deep work and life balance |
|
☐ |
Navigates
ambiguity: thrives in a challenge without a clear correct answer |
|
☐ |
Manages
multiple concurrent long-term projects without teacher prompting |
|
☐ |
Identifies
and applies a personal cognitive flexibility strategy |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Conducts a
STEEP analysis (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political) on
a real issue |
|
☐ |
Applies
multi-criteria decision matrix to a significant personal or team choice |
|
☐ |
Argues both
sides of a complex issue with equal rigor (red team/blue team) |
|
☐ |
Writes a
competitive strategy analysis for an entrepreneurship project |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Leads a
boardroom-style strategy presentation with stakeholder Q&A |
|
☐ |
Coordinates
across multiple sub-teams on a complex project |
|
☐ |
Designs and
facilitates a student-authored Harkness curriculum unit |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
formal coaching conversation with a peer using coaching frameworks |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Uses
few-shot, chain-of-thought, and meta-prompting techniques fluently |
|
☐ |
Builds and
deploys a functional app using an AI API (e.g., Anthropic, OpenAI) |
|
☐ |
Writes and
documents a Python automation script for a real-world task |
|
☐ |
Authors an
AI ethics framework for a chosen domain (health, education, justice) |
|
☐ |
Documents a
portfolio of AI-augmented work with human annotation |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.
|
IUP —
Individuell Utvecklingsplan Individual Development Plan Grades
11–12 (Senior High School) · Ages 16–18 Mastery,
Leadership & Contribution to the World |
Student
Name: _______________________________ Teacher: _______________________________ School
Year: _______________________________ Conference
Date: _______________________________ |
MASTERY SCALE — Circle or check the student's current level for
each skill
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Academic Skills & Knowledge |
|
|
☐ |
Publishes
original research at AP or dual-enrollment college level |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
mastery in chosen academic pathway (STEM, Humanities, Arts, Design) |
|
☐ |
Applies
statistics and data science: models, validation, interpretation |
|
☐ |
Writes a
grant proposal, policy memo, or academic paper for a real audience |
|
☐ |
Achieves B2+
fluency in a world language |
|
☐ |
Applies
philosophical frameworks (ethics, epistemology, logic) to real decisions |
|
☐ |
Completes
Senior Capstone: 2-year passion project culminating in public presentation |
|
π€ Human & Social-Emotional Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Articulates
a personal mission statement and 10-year vision |
|
☐ |
Completes an
immersive empathy experience with an underrepresented community |
|
☐ |
Leads with
vulnerability and courage: models authentic leadership for peers |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
Emotional Intelligence 2.0: self-awareness, empathy, influence, conflict
mastery |
|
☐ |
Designs an
ohana legacy: what do I leave behind for those who come after? |
|
☐ |
Maintains a
reflective practice journal across the senior year |
|
π§ Executive Function Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
executive presence: communicates with clarity, conviction, composure |
|
☐ |
Applies
habit architecture to build a sustainable learning system |
|
☐ |
Navigates
setback and failure using a post-mortem framework |
|
☐ |
Practices
strategic patience: pursues long-horizon goals without constant reinforcement |
|
☐ |
Authors and
executes a personal 3-year strategic plan |
|
♟️ Strategic & Analytical Thinking |
|
|
☐ |
Applies blue
ocean thinking to identify an uncontested value opportunity |
|
☐ |
Identifies
leverage points in a complex system and designs an intervention |
|
☐ |
Conducts a
McKinsey-style MECE problem decomposition on a real challenge |
|
☐ |
Presents a
hypothesis-driven analysis to a real external audience |
|
π₯ Collaborative & Cooperative Learning |
|
|
☐ |
Founds or
leads a student organization, startup, or nonprofit |
|
☐ |
Manages a
cross-sector partnership (school + business/NGO/government) |
|
☐ |
Co-teaches a
curriculum unit in a lower grade as a guest expert |
|
☐ |
Delivers a
TED-style Capstone presentation to a community + peer audience |
|
π€ AI, Technology & Future-Ready Skills |
|
|
☐ |
Ships a
functional AI-augmented product or tool to real users |
|
☐ |
Demonstrates
LLM literacy: explains how large language models work and fail |
|
☐ |
Orchestrates
an agentic AI workflow for a complex multi-step real-world task |
|
☐ |
Submits an
AI governance policy proposal to a real organization |
|
☐ |
Presents a
portfolio of AI-augmented work with critical reflection and evidence |
OVERALL IUP MASTERY RATING — Mark one for this period
|
☐ EMERGING Building
foundational skills. Needs consistent support to access learning objectives. |
☐ PASS
(50%+ Mastery) Demonstrates
core skills consistently. Participates with occasional guidance. |
★ HIGH PASS
(75%+ Mastery) Applies,
transfers, and teaches skills. Shows original thinking and leadership. |
|
π Student's Greatest Strengths This Period
(Teacher + Student voice) __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π― Goals for Next Period — Academic, Human,
and Executive Function __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
π‘ Support Needed — What will school provide?
What will family provide? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
✍️ Student's Own Voice — What am I most proud
of? What do I want to get better at? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
THREE-WAY CONFERENCE SIGNATURES — This IUP is reviewed and
agreed upon by all three parties.
|
Teacher / Educator |
Student |
Parent / Guardian |
|
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
Name:
___________________________ Signature:
______________________ Date:
___________________________ |
This IUP is updated at each marking period conference. It is a
living document — not a verdict, but a shared compass.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!