For centuries, English speakers have struggled to learn to read and write their language using the ill-fitted Roman alphabet. This orthographic mismatch underlies many complexities in teaching English literacy, leading educators to constantly search for better instructional approaches. Experts argue that fundamental English spelling reform could resolve these difficulties at their root.
The latest trend is the “science of reading,” which aims to provide teachers with an intricate understanding of the cognitive components involved in decoding, pronunciation, and comprehension. This method intensely focuses on phonics, breaking reading down to the “atomic level” of individual sounds and letters. While valuable in equipping teachers, it also highlights the irregular relationship between English orthography and phonology.
To a learner, the vowels “ea” in “bread” versus “head” seem arbitrarily confusing. Common irregular spellings and silent letters multiply the memorization required to attach sounds to spelling patterns. This opacity causes reading disabilities like dyslexia and creates obstacles to basic literacy. Under the science of reading model, explicit phonics drilling becomes essential to make sense of the messy English writing system.
Advocates of spelling reform argue that rather than endlessly unpacking the complexities created by the Roman alphabet, educators should fix the underlying problem. An optimized phonetic alphabet with one-to-one symbol-sound correspondence could streamline early reading. This transparency could allow children to sound out words themselves rather than memorize abstract rules and patterns.
However, completely replacing English orthography poses monumental challenges. Constructed phonetic alphabets have been proposed for over 200 years without viable implementation. While the benefits for literacy are clear, moving public texts and curriculum to a new writing system would require massive coordinated effort. Partial solutions like diacritical marks also introduce new complexities.
As the science of reading shows, our mismatched alphabet continues to complicate English literacy education. In the long-term, experts advocate that rationalizing our spelling through alphabet reform may be the most effective path to teaching our children to read and write.
The challenges of English orthography have spurred calls for spelling reform for over 200 years. While adopting a phonetic alphabet poses difficulties, experts continue to see its potential benefits for learning to read and write. The coming decades may see renewed interest in rationalizing English spelling, finally aligning written symbols to the sounds we speak.
Dyslexia is less common in speakers of other languages than in English-speaking countries. Some say that languages that are more transparent, meaning they have more consistent letter-sound correspondence, may be easier for people with dyslexia:
Spanish, Italian, and German These languages have clear sound-letter correspondence, which can make reading and spelling easier. German also has a sound system that is similar to English and the two languages share many words.
Finnish, Hungarian, Basque, Welsh, Albanian, Czech, and Finnish
These languages have transparent orthographies, meaning the letters and sounds are matched more consistently.
Japanese
According to iflscience.com, dyslexia is less common among Japanese speakers than in other languages.
Other languages that are considered more phonetic and may be easier for people with dyslexia include Korean.
The language with the largest alphabet designed for a one-to-one letter-sound correspondence is likely Georgian. The Georgian alphabet consists of 33 letters to represent the 28 phonemes (distinct sounds) in the Georgian language.
Some key facts about the Georgian alphabet:
- It was created around the 4th century AD by a Georgian scholar named Mesrop Mashtots.
- The original version had 38 letters, but 5 letters were later removed as the pronunciation of Georgian changed.
- The letters are grouped into 8 categories based on the position of the tongue in articulating the sounds. For example, letters produced using the back of the tongue are grouped together.
- There are separate letters for voiced and unvoiced versions of consonants (e.g. ბ b and ფ p). This helps maintain the one-sound-per-letter principle.
- The shapes of the letters are thought to have been inspired by the Greek, Aramaic and Persian scripts.
- Georgian contains unique sounds not found in many other languages, which accounts for the relatively large number of letters needed.
- Due to its phonetic regularity, Georgian is considered one of the easiest writing systems to master for reading and spelling. Children can learn to achieve literacy very rapidly.
So in summary, the depth and consistency of sound-symbol correspondence in the Georgian alphabet make it the largest true phonemic alphabet in the world. This linguistic ingenuity has made Georgian literacy quite accessible despite the large number of letters.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you!